rs747406932

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):ā€‹c.5884A>Gā€‹(p.Ile1962Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,710 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I1962T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 6.8e-7 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0230
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0689314).
BP6
Variant 13-32340239-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32340239-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 531229.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.5884A>G p.Ile1962Val missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8 NP_000050.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.5884A>G p.Ile1962Val missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 ENSP00000369497 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000797
AC:
2
AN:
250974
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00000736
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135796
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
6.84e-7
AC:
1
AN:
1461710
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
46
AF XY:
0.00000138
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
727154
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33
ExAC
AF:
0.0000165
AC:
2

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 23, 2023Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 24, 2020The p.I1962V variant (also known as c.5884A>G), located in coding exon 10 of the BRCA2 gene, results from an A to G substitution at nucleotide position 5884. The isoleucine at codon 1962 is replaced by valine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration has been reported in 1/434 Nigerian breast cancer patients (Fackenthal JD et al. Int. J. Cancer, 2012 Sep;131:1114-23). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicJun 23, 2017- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpMar 24, 2018This sequence change replaces isoleucine with valine at codon 1962 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Ile1962Val). The isoleucine residue is weakly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between isoleucine and valine. This variant is present in population databases (rs747406932, ExAC 0.02%). This variant has been reported in an individual affected with breast cancer (PMID: 22034289). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The valine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, suggesting that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. These predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.065
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.32
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
0.15
DANN
Benign
0.38
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.22
N
M_CAP
Benign
0.032
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.069
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.90
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.21
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.080
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.029
Sift
Benign
0.27
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.43
T;T
Vest4
0.16
MutPred
0.34
Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0023);Gain of relative solvent accessibility (P = 0.0023);
MVP
0.63
MPC
0.020
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
-1.2
gMVP
0.087

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs747406932; hg19: chr13-32914376; API