rs747839312
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_006514.4(SCN10A):c.2465C>T(p.Ala822Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000923 in 1,614,050 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006514.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN10A | ENST00000449082.3 | c.2465C>T | p.Ala822Val | missense_variant | 16/28 | 1 | NM_006514.4 | ENSP00000390600.2 | ||
SCN10A | ENST00000643924.1 | c.2465C>T | p.Ala822Val | missense_variant | 15/27 | ENSP00000495595.1 | ||||
SCN10A | ENST00000655275.1 | c.2492C>T | p.Ala831Val | missense_variant | 16/28 | ENSP00000499510.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152158Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000279 AC: 7AN: 251134Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135758
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000971 AC: 142AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000908 AC XY: 66AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152158Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74326
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 14, 2022 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
Brugada syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 25, 2022 | This sequence change replaces alanine, which is neutral and non-polar, with valine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 822 of the SCN10A protein (p.Ala822Val). This variant is present in population databases (rs747839312, gnomAD 0.005%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with SCN10A-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 463240). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt SCN10A protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Episodic pain syndrome, familial, 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 12, 2021 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 17, 2024 | The p.A822V variant (also known as c.2465C>T), located in coding exon 15 of the SCN10A gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 2465. The alanine at codon 822 is replaced by valine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at