rs748187082

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS2_Supporting

The NM_001040694.2(INCENP):c.128G>A(p.Arg43His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000112 in 1,614,044 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R43C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000096 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

INCENP
NM_001040694.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.18

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

INCENP (HGNC:6058): (inner centromere protein) In mammalian cells, 2 broad groups of centromere-interacting proteins have been described: constitutively binding centromere proteins and 'passenger,' or transiently interacting, proteins (reviewed by Choo, 1997). The constitutive proteins include CENPA (centromere protein A; MIM 117139), CENPB (MIM 117140), CENPC1 (MIM 117141), and CENPD (MIM 117142). The term 'passenger proteins' encompasses a broad collection of proteins that localize to the centromere during specific stages of the cell cycle (Earnshaw and Mackay, 1994 [PubMed 8088460]). These include CENPE (MIM 117143); MCAK (MIM 604538); KID (MIM 603213); cytoplasmic dynein (e.g., MIM 600112); CliPs (e.g., MIM 179838); and CENPF/mitosin (MIM 600236). The inner centromere proteins (INCENPs) (Earnshaw and Cooke, 1991 [PubMed 1860899]), the initial members of the passenger protein group, display a broad localization along chromosomes in the early stages of mitosis but gradually become concentrated at centromeres as the cell cycle progresses into mid-metaphase. During telophase, the proteins are located within the midbody in the intercellular bridge, where they are discarded after cytokinesis (Cutts et al., 1999 [PubMed 10369859]).[supplied by OMIM, Mar 2008]

INCENP links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.21964979).

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 14 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001040694.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	INCENP	NM_001040694.2	MANE Select	c.128G>A	p.Arg43His	missense	Exon 2 of 19	NP_001035784.1	Q9NQS7-1
	INCENP	NM_020238.3		c.128G>A	p.Arg43His	missense	Exon 2 of 18	NP_064623.2	Q9NQS7-2

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
INCENP	ENST00000394818.8	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.128G>A	p.Arg43His	missense	Exon 2 of 19	ENSP00000378295.3	Q9NQS7-1
INCENP	ENST00000528037.1	TSL:1	n.292G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 2 of 5
INCENP	ENST00000887855.1		c.128G>A	p.Arg43His	missense	Exon 2 of 18	ENSP00000557914.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152184

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000483

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000279

AC:

AN:

251252

AF XY:

0.0000368

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000109

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000958

AC:

AN:

1461742

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000963

AC XY:

AN XY:

727172

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000179

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000224

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000232

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53318

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000360

AC:

AN:

1111974

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.432

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000263

AC:

AN:

152302

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000403

AC XY:

AN XY:

74474

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000481

AC:

AN:

41556

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15308

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10628

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68016

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2106

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.550

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000434

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000264

ExAC

AF:

0.0000247

AC:

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions as Germline

Significance:Uncertain significance

Revision:criteria provided, single submitter

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

not specified (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.22

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.25

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.32

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.31

Eigen

Uncertain

0.56

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.53

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.69

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.90

M_CAP

Benign

0.027

MetaRNN

Benign

0.22

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.91

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.7

PhyloP100

1.2

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.50

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.9

REVEL

Benign

0.13

Sift

Uncertain

0.0040

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.0050

Polyphen

1.0

Vest4

0.38

MutPred

0.24

Loss of phosphorylation at T46 (P = 0.0803)

MVP

0.67

MPC

0.33

ClinPred

0.54

GERP RS

3.8

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.80

gMVP

0.17

Mutation Taster

=61/39

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over