rs748433747
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.424-10C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000274 in 1,604,470 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006231.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- POLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
- IMAGe syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152206Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000479 AC: 12AN: 250690 AF XY: 0.0000812 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000275 AC: 40AN: 1452264Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000306 AC XY: 22AN XY: 720086 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152206Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74362 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
- -
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:1
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -
Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposis Benign:1
The POLE c.424-10C>T variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs748433747) as "With Likely benign allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae, GeneDx and Counsyl), and LOVD 3.0 (1x as benign). The variant was identified in control databases in 11 of 245386 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00005 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 1 of 33552 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), European in 10 of 111028 chromosomes (freq: 0.00009), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, and South Asian populations. The c.424-10C>T variant is located in the 3' splice region but does not affect the invariant -1 and -2 positions. However, positions -3 and -5 to -12 are part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving these positions sometimes affect splicing. However, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
POLE-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at