rs74880446
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1
The NM_019892.6(INPP5E):c.1506G>A(p.Pro502=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00116 in 1,609,570 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 0 hom., cov: 29)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
INPP5E
NM_019892.6 synonymous
NM_019892.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0160
Genes affected
INPP5E (HGNC:21474): (inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase E) The protein encoded by this gene is an inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3) 5-phosphatase. InsP3 5-phosphatases hydrolyze Ins(1,4,5)P3, which mobilizes intracellular calcium and acts as a second messenger mediating cell responses to various stimulation. Studies of the mouse counterpart suggest that this protein may hydrolyze phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate and phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate on the cytoplasmic Golgi membrane and thereby regulate Golgi-vesicular trafficking. Mutations in this gene cause Joubert syndrome; a clinically and genetically heterogenous group of disorders characterized by midbrain-hindbrain malformation and various associated ciliopathies that include retinal dystrophy, nephronophthisis, liver fibrosis and polydactyly. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BP6
?
Variant 9-136431867-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-136431867-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 365880.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr9-136431867-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.016 with no splicing effect.
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00104 (156/149496) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00193 (130/67370). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00166. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 79 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INPP5E | NM_019892.6 | c.1506G>A | p.Pro502= | synonymous_variant | 7/10 | ENST00000371712.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INPP5E | ENST00000371712.4 | c.1506G>A | p.Pro502= | synonymous_variant | 7/10 | 1 | NM_019892.6 | P1 | |
INPP5E | ENST00000676019.1 | c.1404G>A | p.Pro468= | synonymous_variant | 7/10 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00104 AC: 156AN: 149378Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
156
AN:
149378
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000861 AC: 212AN: 246178Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00101 AC XY: 135AN XY: 134188
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
212
AN:
246178
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
135
AN XY:
134188
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00117 AC: 1709AN: 1460074Hom.: 2 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00119 AC XY: 866AN XY: 726382
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1709
AN:
1460074
Hom.:
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
AC XY:
866
AN XY:
726382
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00104 AC: 156AN: 149496Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00108 AC XY: 79AN XY: 72890
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
156
AN:
149496
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
79
AN XY:
72890
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Dec 01, 2023 | INPP5E: BP4, BP7 - |
Joubert syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at