rs748896420

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_022489.4(INF2):c.2418+3G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000412 in 1,553,340 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000041 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

INF2
NM_022489.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.001768

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0290

Variant links:

Genes affected

INF2 (HGNC:23791): (inverted formin 2) This gene represents a member of the formin family of proteins. It is considered a diaphanous formin due to the presence of a diaphanous inhibitory domain located at the N-terminus of the encoded protein. Studies of a similar mouse protein indicate that the protein encoded by this locus may function in polymerization and depolymerization of actin filaments. Mutations at this locus have been associated with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

INF2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000394 (6/152196) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0000882 (6/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000376. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 4 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 6 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
INF2	NM_022489.4 link	c.2418+3G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 15 of 22	ENST00000392634.9	NP_071934.3	Q27J81-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
INF2	ENST00000392634.9 link	c.2418+3G>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 15 of 22	5	NM_022489.4	ENSP00000376410.4		Q27J81-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152196

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000316

AC:

AN:

158066

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000355

AC XY:

AN XY:

84566

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000641

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000225

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000414

AC:

AN:

1401144

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000419

AC XY:

AN XY:

691776

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000537

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152196

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000538

AC XY:

AN XY:

74358

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000882

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000762

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000378

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis 5;C4302667:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease dominant intermediate E

Uncertain:2

Aug 27, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 12, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change falls in intron 15 of the INF2 gene. It does not directly change the encoded amino acid sequence of the INF2 protein. It affects a nucleotide within the consensus splice site. The frequency data for this variant in the population databases is considered unreliable, as metrics indicate poor data quality at this position in the gnomAD database. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with INF2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 566305). Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant is not likely to affect RNA splicing. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Uncertain:1

Feb 25, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The c.2418+3G>A intronic variant results from a G to A substitution 3 nucleotides after coding exon 14 in the INF2 gene. This nucleotide position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In silico splice site analysis predicts that this alteration will not have any significant effect on splicing. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.78

CADD

Benign

9.7

DANN

Benign

0.87

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.0018

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.21

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over