rs749009127
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 1P and 2B. PP2BP4_Moderate
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.83332G>T(p.Val27778Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000744 in 1,613,146 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.83332G>T | p.Val27778Leu | missense_variant | 326/363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 | |
TTN-AS1 | NR_038272.1 | n.2044-19772C>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.83332G>T | p.Val27778Leu | missense_variant | 326/363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141 | P1 | |
TTN-AS1 | ENST00000659121.1 | n.417-34796C>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000162 AC: 4AN: 247220Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000745 AC XY: 1AN XY: 134224
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000479 AC: 7AN: 1461010Hom.: 0 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 726776
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000329 AC: 5AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74320
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Apr 18, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at