rs74902811

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000535.7(PMS2):c.1532C>T(p.Thr511Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00526 in 1,614,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 283 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T511A) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.024 ( 134 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0033 ( 149 hom. )

Consequence

PMS2
NM_000535.7 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:25O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.250

Variant links:

Genes affected

PMS2 (HGNC:9122): (PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component) The protein encoded by this gene is a key component of the mismatch repair system that functions to correct DNA mismatches and small insertions and deletions that can occur during DNA replication and homologous recombination. This protein forms heterodimers with the gene product of the mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) gene to form the MutL-alpha heterodimer. The MutL-alpha heterodimer possesses an endonucleolytic activity that is activated following recognition of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by the MutS-alpha and MutS-beta heterodimers, and is necessary for removal of the mismatched DNA. There is a DQHA(X)2E(X)4E motif found at the C-terminus of the protein encoded by this gene that forms part of the active site of the nuclease. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC; also known as Lynch syndrome) and Turcot syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]

PMS2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0023566186).

BP6

Variant 7-5987233-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-5987233-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 41704.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr7-5987233-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr7-5987233-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0763 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PMS2	NM_000535.7 link	c.1532C>T	p.Thr511Met	missense_variant	Exon 11 of 15	ENST00000265849.12	NP_000526.2	P54278-1Q7Z3Q2B4DGM0

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PMS2	ENST00000265849.12 link	c.1532C>T	p.Thr511Met	missense_variant	Exon 11 of 15	1	NM_000535.7	ENSP00000265849.7		P54278-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0236

AC:

3595

AN:

152122

Hom.:

128

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0782

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00714

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0324

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00269

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000943

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00949

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000367

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0182

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00811

AC:

2037

AN:

251308

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00660

AC XY:

897

AN XY:

135868

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0813

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00292

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0291

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000947

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000238

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00424

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00333

AC:

4868

AN:

1461812

Hom.:

149

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00302

AC XY:

2193

AN XY:

727194

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0834

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00380

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0290

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00117

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000187

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00705

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0238

AC:

3620

AN:

152240

Hom.:

134

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0236

AC XY:

1759

AN XY:

74420

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0786

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00713

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0323

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00269

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0000943

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000368

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0180

Alfa

AF:

0.00616

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0270

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0774

AC:

341

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000349

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00937

AC:

1138

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0200

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000327

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:25Other:1

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:7Other:1

Mar 04, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Jun 10, 2021

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.Thr511Met variant in PMS2 is classified as benign because it has been identified in 8.03% (2002/24922) of African chromosomes, including 81 homozygotes, by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). In addition, computational prediction and conservation tools suggest that this variant does not impact the protein. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BA1, BP4. -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:6

Nov 18, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 04, 2016

Vantari Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 27, 2021

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 12, 2014

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

True Health Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 07, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Oct 16, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 19, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 13, 2012

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: flagged submission

Collection Method: research

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327, 27153395, 27884173, 24027009) -

Lynch syndrome 4

Benign:4

Jun 05, 2017

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 09, 2014

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 02, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Lynch syndrome

Benign:2

Sep 05, 2013

International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: research

MAF >1% -

Sep 28, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:1

Jun 30, 2021

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms

Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The PMS2 p.Thr511Met variant was identified in the literature however the frequency of this variant in an affected population was not provided. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs74902811) as With other allele, ClinVar (classified as benign by InSight, Ambry Genetics, Prevention Genetics, Color Genimics, Invitae; classified as likely benign by Vantary genetics, Illumina), Clinvitae (classified with conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity), MutDB , Insight Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (2X class1), Insight Hereditary Tumors Database (2X class1), databases. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 2670(84 homozygous) of 277088 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.009636 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: African in 1930 of 24008 chromosomes (freq: 0.08), EastAsian in 549 of 18862 chromosomes (freq: 0.029). In cell free assay by Drost (2013) the variant not classified as repair deficient and might be pathogenic with reduced penetrance. Tthe variant classified as benign by ACMG-AMP classification for consensus variants (Amendola 2016). The p.Thr511 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.075

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.58

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.54

CADD

Benign

0.17

DANN

Benign

0.82

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.12

T;.;.;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.97

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.1

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.022

LIST_S2

Benign

0.65

T;T;.;T;.

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0024

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.96

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.1

L;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.22

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.87

N;N;.;.;.

REVEL

Benign

0.14

Sift

Benign

0.21

T;T;.;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.21

T;T;.;.;.

Polyphen

0.030

B;B;.;.;B

Vest4

0.12

MVP

0.39

MPC

0.039

ClinPred

0.00024

GERP RS

-3.2

Varity_R

0.014

gMVP

0.23

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over