rs749351351

chr11-61397964-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2 BP4_Strong BP7

The NM_001173990.3(TMEM216):c.420T>C(p.Ala140=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000049 in 1,613,726 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000049 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: TMEM216 NM_001173990.3 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3 B:2
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -3.80

Genes affected

TMEM216 (HGNC:25018): (transmembrane protein 216) This locus encodes a transmembrane domain-containing protein. Mutations at this locus have been associated with Meckel-Gruber Syndrome Type 2, and Joubert Syndrome 2, also known as Cerebello-oculorenal Syndrome 2. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

• PM2: Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage
• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.8 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
TMEM216	NM_001173990.3	c.420T>C	p.Ala140=	synonymous_variant	4/5	ENST00000515837.7
TMEM216	NM_001173991.3	c.420T>C	p.Ala140=	synonymous_variant	4/5
TMEM216	NM_016499.6	c.237T>C	p.Ala79=	synonymous_variant	4/5
TMEM216	NM_001330285.2	c.237T>C	p.Ala79=	synonymous_variant	4/5

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
TMEM216	ENST00000515837.7	c.420T>C	p.Ala140=	synonymous_variant	4/5	2	NM_001173990.3	P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8 AN: 152222 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00173

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000963 AC: 24 AN: 249126 Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000111 AC XY: 15 AN XY: 135170

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00189

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000442

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000486 AC: 71 AN: 1461504 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0000523 AC XY: 38 AN XY: 727066

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00214

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00000540

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000133

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8 AN: 152222 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4 AN XY: 74374

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00173

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Alfa AF: 0.000316 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.0000642

EpiCase AF: 0.0000545

EpiControl AF: 0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3 Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

Submissions by phenotype

Joubert syndrome 2 Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Natera, Inc.	Apr 14, 2020	- -

Meckel syndrome, type 2 Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Feb 13, 2018

- -

Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Jan 04, 2024

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.92
Cadd	Benign	0.84
Dann	Benign	0.55
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.0

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs749351351; hg19: chr11-61165436;