rs749952755
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5
The NM_003995.4(NPR2):c.14C>A(p.Ser5*) variant causes a stop gained change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003995.4 stop_gained
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- acromesomelic dysplasia 1, Maroteaux typeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
- short stature with nonspecific skeletal abnormalities 1Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- tall stature-scoliosis-macrodactyly of the great toes syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 30
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Acromesomelic dysplasia 1, Maroteaux type Pathogenic:1
Sequencing analysis of the NPR2 gene revealed a novel mutation NM_003995.4: c.14C>A (p.Ser5Ter) in a patient presented with disproportionate short stature with short limbs. On physical examination, dolichocephaly, a prominent forehead, depressed nasal root with a bulbous nose, down-slanted palpebral fissures, short limbs, and brachydactyly were noted. Furthermore, radiographic findings of the patient were compatible with Acromesomelic dysplasia, Maroteaux type. This variant was neither reported in ExAC nor gnomAD databases. This variant was classified as pathogenic according to the ACMG Guidelines and predicted to be disease causing by in silico analysis such as MutationTaster. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at