rs750324465
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_003238.6(TGFB2):c.194C>T(p.Pro65Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000198 in 1,614,070 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P65S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003238.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFB2 | NM_003238.6 | c.194C>T | p.Pro65Leu | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 7 | ENST00000366930.9 | NP_003229.1 | |
TGFB2 | NM_001135599.4 | c.194C>T | p.Pro65Leu | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 8 | NP_001129071.1 | ||
TGFB2 | NR_138148.2 | n.1560C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 7 | ||||
TGFB2 | NR_138149.2 | n.1560C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 1 of 8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFB2 | ENST00000366930.9 | c.194C>T | p.Pro65Leu | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 7 | 1 | NM_003238.6 | ENSP00000355897.4 | ||
TGFB2 | ENST00000366929.4 | c.194C>T | p.Pro65Leu | missense_variant | Exon 1 of 8 | 1 | ENSP00000355896.4 | |||
TGFB2 | ENST00000488793.1 | n.-143C>T | upstream_gene_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251312Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000294 AC XY: 4AN XY: 135880
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000178 AC: 26AN: 1461880Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000193 AC XY: 14AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152190Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74340
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Loeys-Dietz syndrome 4 Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 65 of the TGFB2 protein (p.Pro65Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs750324465, gnomAD 0.01%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with TGFB2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 213850). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt TGFB2 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
- -
not provided Uncertain:2
TGFB2: PM2:Supporting, PS4:Supporting, BP4 -
Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function -
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Uncertain:1
The p.P65L variant (also known as c.194C>T), located in coding exon 1 of the TGFB2 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 194. The proline at codon 65 is replaced by leucine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is conserved. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at