rs75049807

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001039958.2(MESP2):​c.531G>A​(p.Ala177Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0485 in 1,450,976 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,832 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A177A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.039 ( 141 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.050 ( 1691 hom. )

Consequence

MESP2
NM_001039958.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.182

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MESP2 (HGNC:29659): (mesoderm posterior bHLH transcription factor 2) This gene encodes a member of the bHLH family of transcription factors and plays a key role in defining the rostrocaudal patterning of somites via interactions with multiple Notch signaling pathways. This gene is expressed in the anterior presomitic mesoderm and is downregulated immediately after the formation of segmented somites. This gene also plays a role in the formation of epithelial somitic mesoderm and cardiac mesoderm. Mutations in the MESP2 gene cause autosomal recessive spondylocostal dystosis 2 (SCD02). [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
MESP2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • spondylocostal dysostosis 2, autosomal recessive
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • autosomal recessive spondylocostal dysostosis
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).
BP6
Variant 15-89776888-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-89776888-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 257241.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.182 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0634 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MESP2NM_001039958.2 linkc.531G>A p.Ala177Ala synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 2 ENST00000341735.5 NP_001035047.1 Q0VG99

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MESP2ENST00000341735.5 linkc.531G>A p.Ala177Ala synonymous_variant Exon 1 of 2 1 NM_001039958.2 ENSP00000342392.3 Q0VG99
MESP2ENST00000560219.2 linkc.31-1177G>A intron_variant Intron 2 of 2 1 ENSP00000452998.1 H0YKZ5
MESP2ENST00000558723.1 linkn.39-1177G>A intron_variant Intron 1 of 1 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0385
AC:
5841
AN:
151638
Hom.:
139
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0163
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0647
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0118
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0692
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0358
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0452
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0516
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0316
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0487
AC:
3706
AN:
76110
AF XY:
0.0491
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0248
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0339
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0144
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0796
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0610
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0550
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0406
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0496
AC:
64477
AN:
1299226
Hom.:
1691
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0497
AC XY:
31487
AN XY:
632938
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0172
AC:
474
AN:
27584
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0365
AC:
796
AN:
21834
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0120
AC:
227
AN:
18986
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0645
AC:
2171
AN:
33680
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0359
AC:
2331
AN:
64862
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0522
AC:
1810
AN:
34666
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0233
AC:
95
AN:
4080
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0523
AC:
54333
AN:
1039606
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0415
AC:
2240
AN:
53928
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.494
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4005
8009
12014
16018
20023
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2120
4240
6360
8480
10600
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0386
AC:
5851
AN:
151750
Hom.:
141
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0378
AC XY:
2803
AN XY:
74116
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0163
AC:
678
AN:
41504
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0327
AC:
499
AN:
15264
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0118
AC:
41
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0694
AC:
352
AN:
5072
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0357
AC:
171
AN:
4794
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0452
AC:
473
AN:
10474
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0137
AC:
4
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0516
AC:
3499
AN:
67858
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0355
AC:
75
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
300
600
899
1199
1499
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
72
144
216
288
360
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00345
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.0363
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0580
AC:
200
AN:
3472

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Jun 14, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Spondylocostal dysostosis 2, autosomal recessive Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nov 27, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
CADD
Benign
8.6
DANN
Benign
0.75
PhyloP100
0.18
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs75049807; hg19: chr15-90320119; COSMIC: COSV59092036; API