rs75075497

Positions:

chr14-102033364-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):c.10293C>T(p.Asn3431=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000558 in 1,614,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0031 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00030 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC1H1
NM_001376.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.782

Variant links:

Genes affected

DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

DYNC1H1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.27).

BP6

Variant 14-102033364-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102033364-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 384931.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.782 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00307 (467/152318) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.011 (457/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0102. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 211 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 467 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
DYNC1H1	NM_001376.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.10293C>T	p.Asn3431=	synonymous_variant	54/78	ENST00000360184.10

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
DYNC1H1	ENST00000360184.10 linkuse as main transcript	c.10293C>T	p.Asn3431=	synonymous_variant	54/78	1	NM_001376.5	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00306

AC:

466

AN:

152200

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0110

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000708

AC:

178

AN:

251422

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000456

AC XY:

AN XY:

135902

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0105

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000296

AC:

433

AN:

1461886

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000275

AC XY:

200

AN XY:

727242

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0114

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000201

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000153

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000397

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00307

AC:

467

AN:

152318

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00283

AC XY:

211

AN XY:

74466

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0110

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00237

Alfa

AF:

0.00148

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00311

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Dec 05, 2016	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Mar 30, 2017	- -

not provided

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Jun 01, 2024	DYNC1H1: BP4, BP7, BS1 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 25, 2024

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Apr 15, 2016

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.27

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.91

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over