rs75094258

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001376.5(DYNC1H1):ā€‹c.4854T>Cā€‹(p.Tyr1618Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000743 in 1,614,180 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0035 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00045 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC1H1
NM_001376.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.24
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC1H1 (HGNC:2961): (dynein cytoplasmic 1 heavy chain 1) Dyneins are a group of microtubule-activated ATPases that function as molecular motors. They are divided into two subgroups of axonemal and cytoplasmic dyneins. The cytoplasmic dyneins function in intracellular motility, including retrograde axonal transport, protein sorting, organelle movement, and spindle dynamics. Molecules of conventional cytoplasmic dynein are comprised of 2 heavy chain polypeptides and a number of intermediate and light chains.This gene encodes a member of the cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain family. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 14-102002936-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-102002936-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 312628.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-102002936-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr14-102002936-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00353 (537/152328) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0113 (471/41570). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0105. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 276 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 537 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
DYNC1H1NM_001376.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.4854T>C p.Tyr1618Tyr synonymous_variant 23/78 ENST00000360184.10 NP_001367.2 Q14204

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DYNC1H1ENST00000360184.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.4854T>C p.Tyr1618Tyr synonymous_variant 23/781 NM_001376.5 ENSP00000348965.4 Q14204

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00353
AC:
537
AN:
152210
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00383
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00102
AC:
255
AN:
251128
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000862
AC XY:
117
AN XY:
135730
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0121
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00113
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000141
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000490
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000454
AC:
663
AN:
1461852
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000407
AC XY:
296
AN XY:
727220
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0122
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00109
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00353
AC:
537
AN:
152328
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00370
AC XY:
276
AN XY:
74508
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0113
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000176
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00379
Alfa
AF:
0.00192
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00390
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000327
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2024DYNC1H1: BP4, BS1 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsSep 25, 2018- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJun 06, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 28, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2O Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 30, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 26, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
CADD
Benign
8.5
DANN
Benign
0.48

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs75094258; hg19: chr14-102469273; API