rs751496223
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_006493.4(CLN5):c.642A>T(p.Val214Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000113 in 1,614,028 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CLN5
NM_006493.4 synonymous
NM_006493.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.811
Genes affected
CLN5 (HGNC:2076): (CLN5 intracellular trafficking protein) This gene is one of eight which have been associated with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL). Also referred to as Batten disease, NCL comprises a class of autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative disorders affecting children. The genes responsible likely encode proteins involved in the degradation of post-translationally modified proteins in lysosomes. The primary defect in NCL disorders is thought to be associated with lysosomal storage function.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 13-77000534-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-77000534-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 312428.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.811 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLN5 | NM_006493.4 | c.642A>T | p.Val214Val | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | ENST00000377453.9 | NP_006484.2 | |
CLN5 | NM_001366624.2 | c.*91A>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 5/5 | NP_001353553.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLN5 | ENST00000377453.9 | c.642A>T | p.Val214Val | synonymous_variant | 4/4 | 1 | NM_006493.4 | ENSP00000366673.5 | ||
ENSG00000283208 | ENST00000638147.2 | c.565+4407A>T | intron_variant | 5 | ENSP00000490953.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152200Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
152200
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000597 AC: 15AN: 251314Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000589 AC XY: 8AN XY: 135830
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
251314
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
135830
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000118 AC: 173AN: 1461828Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000114 AC XY: 83AN XY: 727218
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
173
AN:
1461828
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
83
AN XY:
727218
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152200Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74352
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
152200
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74352
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 5 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Aug 10, 2021 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 17, 2023 | - - |
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 18, 2020 | - - |
Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinosis, Dominant/Recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 30, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 23, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at