rs75220808

chr12-88103002-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_025114.4(CEP290):c.2827A>G(p.Ile943Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00115 in 1,549,086 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0063 (15 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00059 (7 hom.)
• Consequence: CEP290 NM_025114.4 missense
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10 O:1
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.133

Genes affected

CEP290 (HGNC:29021): (centrosomal protein 290) This gene encodes a protein with 13 putative coiled-coil domains, a region with homology to SMC chromosome segregation ATPases, six KID motifs, three tropomyosin homology domains and an ATP/GTP binding site motif A. The protein is localized to the centrosome and cilia and has sites for N-glycosylation, tyrosine sulfation, phosphorylation, N-myristoylation, and amidation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis and the presence of antibodies against this protein is associated with several forms of cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0024901628).
• BP6: Variant 12-88103002-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-88103002-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 100594.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-88103002-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00628 (956/152246) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0221 (918/41554). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0209. There are 15 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 495 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 15 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
CEP290	NM_025114.4	c.2827A>G	p.Ile943Val	missense_variant	26/54	ENST00000552810.6

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
CEP290	ENST00000552810.6	c.2827A>G	p.Ile943Val	missense_variant	26/54	1	NM_025114.4	P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00629 AC: 957 AN: 152128 Hom.: 15 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0222

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00210

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00287

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00178 AC: 319 AN: 179358 Hom.: 4 AF XY: 0.00120 AC XY: 117 AN XY: 97360

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0250

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00173

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000503

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000237

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000233

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000589 AC: 823 AN: 1396840 Hom.: 7 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000493 AC XY: 341 AN XY: 691220

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0224

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00156

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000557

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000175

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00121

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00628 AC: 956 AN: 152246 Hom.: 15 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00665 AC XY: 495 AN XY: 74446

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0221

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00209

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00284

Alfa AF: 0.0217 Hom.: 2348

Bravo AF: 0.00698

ESP6500AA AF: 0.0200 AC: 73

ESP6500EA AF: 0.00 AC: 0

ExAC AF: 0.00202 AC: 244

Asia WGS AF: 0.00173 AC: 6 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:10 Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Mar 21, 2014	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -

not provided Benign:1 Other:1

not provided, no classification provided	literature only	NEI Ophthalmic Genomics Laboratory, National Institutes of Health	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Nov 06, 2023	- -

Kidney disorder Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Jun 01, 2018

- -

Senior-Loken syndrome 6 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Leber congenital amaurosis 10 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Bardet-Biedl syndrome 14 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis;C0687120:Nephronophthisis Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Jan 30, 2024

- -

Meckel syndrome, type 4 Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Joubert syndrome 5 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Apr 27, 2017

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.053
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.62	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.64
Cadd	Benign	3.5
Dann	Benign	0.34
Eigen	Benign	-0.96
Eigen_PC	Benign	-0.94
FATHMM_MKL	Benign	0.040	N
LIST_S2	Benign	0.76	T;T;T;T
MetaRNN	Benign	0.0025	T;T;T;T
MetaSVM	Benign	-1.1	T
MutationTaster	Benign	1.0	N;N;N;N
PrimateAI	Benign	0.22	T
PROVEAN	Benign	0.45	N;N;N;.
REVEL	Benign	0.051
Sift	Benign	0.80	T;T;T;.
Sift4G	Benign	1.0	T;T;T;T
Polyphen		0.0	.;.;B;.
Vest4		0.10
MVP		0.31
MPC		0.046
ClinPred		0.0020	T
GERP RS		-3.4
RBP_binding_hub_radar		0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		1.1
Varity_R		0.029
gMVP		0.035

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs75220808; hg19: chr12-88496779;