rs752332058

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PVS1_ModerateBP6BS2

The ENST00000378723.7(DMD):​c.1845_1857delTGATTTGGGCAGA​(p.Asp615GlufsTer6) variant causes a frameshift change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000417 in 1,208,174 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. There are 140 hemizygotes in GnomAD. It is difficult to determine the true allele frequency of this variant because it is of type DEL_BIG, and the frequency of such variant types in population databases may be underestimated and unreliable. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 4 hom., 38 hem., cov: 23)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00032 ( 0 hom. 102 hem. )

Consequence

DMD
ENST00000378723.7 frameshift

Scores

Not classified

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.53

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DMD (HGNC:2928): (dystrophin) This gene spans a genomic range of greater than 2 Mb and encodes a large protein containing an N-terminal actin-binding domain and multiple spectrin repeats. The encoded protein forms a component of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC), which bridges the inner cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix. Deletions, duplications, and point mutations at this gene locus may cause Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), or cardiomyopathy. Alternative promoter usage and alternative splicing result in numerous distinct transcript variants and protein isoforms for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]
DMD Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Becker muscular dystrophy
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
  • dilated cardiomyopathy 3B
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health
  • Duchenne muscular dystrophy
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet
  • progressive muscular dystrophy
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • non-syndromic X-linked intellectual disability
    Inheritance: XL Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • symptomatic form of muscular dystrophy of Duchenne and Becker in female carriers
    Inheritance: XL Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

PVS1
Loss of function variant, product does not undergo nonsense mediated mRNA decay. Variant is located in the 3'-most exon, not predicted to undergo nonsense mediated mRNA decay. Fraction of 0.033 CDS is truncated, and there are 0 pathogenic variants in the truncated region.
BP6
Variant X-31121883-CTCTGCCCAAATCA-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-31121883-CTCTGCCCAAATCA-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 201754.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 155 XL,AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DMDNM_004006.3 linkc.*23_*35delTGATTTGGGCAGA 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 79 of 79 ENST00000357033.9 NP_003997.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DMDENST00000357033.9 linkc.*23_*35delTGATTTGGGCAGA 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 79 of 79 1 NM_004006.3 ENSP00000354923.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00138
AC:
155
AN:
112359
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
23
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.169
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000488
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000695
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00132
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000257
AC:
47
AN:
182672
AF XY:
0.000193
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000760
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000365
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000507
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000454
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000318
AC:
349
AN:
1095815
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000282
AC XY:
102
AN XY:
361619
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26323
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000284
AC:
1
AN:
35168
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
19342
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
30185
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
54093
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000718
AC:
29
AN:
40389
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4132
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000358
AC:
301
AN:
840193
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000391
AC:
18
AN:
45990
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.371
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
24
36
48
60
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00138
AC:
155
AN:
112359
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.00110
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
34559
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
30938
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10611
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2652
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3597
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2759
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000488
AC:
3
AN:
6147
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
240
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000695
AC:
37
AN:
53231
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00132
AC:
2
AN:
1514
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
12
17
23
29
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000218
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00211

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:4
Jun 24, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.Asp1223fs in DMD has not been previously reported in individuals with musc ular dystrophy or cardiomyopathy, but has been identified in 22/47909 European c hromosomes, including 6 hemizygotes, by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org). This variant is predicted to cause a frameshift , which alters the protein?s amino acid sequence beginning 28 amino acids upstre am of the C-terminus, leading to a termination codon 6 amino acids downstream. N onsense variants are generally predicted to cause absent protein; however when p resent in the last exon (as is the case for this variant), they are expected to result in a truncated protein. The established disease mechanism for DMD gene is loss of function and the role of other variants is less well understood. In add ition, this variant only affects the coding region on transcripts whose function al impact on skeletal and cardiac muscle is unclear (NM_004016.2, NM_004018.2, N M_004021.2; NM_004022.2, NM_004023.2). While the presence in hemizygous control individuals and lack of impact on coding region of the primary muscle dystrophi n isoform raises some doubt as to whether this variant can cause disease, the DM D gene has not been well sequenced in individuals with diagnoses other than Duch enne muscular dystrophy. Therefore the clinical significance of the p.Asp1223fs variant remains uncertain.

Sep 27, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: DMD c.*23_*35del13 is located in the untranslated mRNA region downstream of the termination codon. Though this variant also affects the coding region of other DMD transcripts (predictably disrupting their reading frame), the role of these affected dystrophin isoforms (e.g. Dp71 (NM_004016.2)) in disease currently is unclear. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00026 in 182672 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 23.33 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in DMD causing Dystrophinopathies phenotype (1.1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.*23_*35del13 has been reported in the literature in 3 individuals affected with Dystrophinopathies, however without strong evidence for causality (Nigro 1994, Spitali 2009, Santos 2014). In addition, in one of these cases the patient also carried a pathogenic DMD variant in cis (deletion of exons 46-50) that could explain his muscular phenotype, though authors noted that the loss of other DMD isoforms (caused by this variant) may have a cumulative effect thereby explaining the patients mental impairment (Santos 2014). On the other hand, another DMD patient carrying the variant of interest, had no mental impairment (Nigro 1994). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. One laboratory classified the variant as benign/likely benign, and one laboratory classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.

Aug 25, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Feb 16, 2025
Laboratory of Genetics, Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

DMD: BS2

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Primary familial dilated cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

DMD-related disorder Benign:1
Nov 06, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

Intellectual disability Benign:1
Jan 29, 2019
Cambridge Genomics Laboratory, East Genomic Laboratory Hub, NHS Genomic Medicine Service
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Duchenne muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Oct 28, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
PhyloP100
8.5
Mutation Taster
=24/176
disease causing (long InDel)

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs752332058; hg19: chrX-31140000; COSMIC: COSV58921107; API