rs752405881
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_005481.3(MED16):c.2515G>A(p.Val839Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000694 in 1,599,218 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005481.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- recurrent Neisseria infections due to factor D deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005481.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MED16 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.2515G>A | p.Val839Met | missense | Exon 16 of 16 | ENSP00000325612.1 | Q9Y2X0-1 | ||
| MED16 | TSL:1 | c.*153G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 16 of 16 | ENSP00000308528.4 | Q9Y2X0-3 | |||
| MED16 | TSL:1 | c.*153G>A | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 15 of 15 | ENSP00000379153.1 | Q9Y2X0-2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152226Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000929 AC: 20AN: 215310 AF XY: 0.000119 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000746 AC: 108AN: 1446992Hom.: 2 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0000876 AC XY: 63AN XY: 718878 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152226Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74372 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at