rs752586864
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_004100.5(EYA4):c.1107+10C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000112 in 1,613,566 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000096 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
EYA4
NM_004100.5 intron
NM_004100.5 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.308
Genes affected
EYA4 (HGNC:3522): (EYA transcriptional coactivator and phosphatase 4) This gene encodes a member of the eyes absent (EYA) family of proteins. The encoded protein may act as a transcriptional activator through its protein phosphatase activity, and it may be important for eye development, and for continued function of the mature organ of Corti. Mutations in this gene are associated with postlingual, progressive, autosomal dominant hearing loss at the deafness, autosomal dominant non-syndromic sensorineural 10 locus. The encoded protein is also a putative oncogene that mediates DNA repair, apoptosis, and innate immunity following DNA damage, cellular damage, and viral attack. Defects in this gene are also associated with dilated cardiomyopathy 1J. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000263 (4/152230) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.000386 (2/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000683. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 0 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 14 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EYA4 | NM_004100.5 | c.1107+10C>G | intron_variant | ENST00000355286.12 | NP_004091.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EYA4 | ENST00000355286.12 | c.1107+10C>G | intron_variant | 1 | NM_004100.5 | ENSP00000347434 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152112Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152112
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000801 AC: 2AN: 249758Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135136
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
249758
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
135136
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000958 AC: 14AN: 1461336Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000124 AC XY: 9AN XY: 727004
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
14
AN:
1461336
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
727004
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152230Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74424
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
152230
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74424
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1J Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 05, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 02, 2021 | - - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 10 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at