rs7529452

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000302.4(PLOD1):​c.294C>T​(p.Phe98=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.311 in 1,613,408 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 82,689 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.25 ( 6299 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.32 ( 76390 hom. )

Consequence

PLOD1
NM_000302.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.08
Variant links:
Genes affected
PLOD1 (HGNC:9081): (procollagen-lysine,2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 1) Lysyl hydroxylase is a membrane-bound homodimeric protein localized to the cisternae of the endoplasmic reticulum. The enzyme (cofactors iron and ascorbate) catalyzes the hydroxylation of lysyl residues in collagen-like peptides. The resultant hydroxylysyl groups are attachment sites for carbohydrates in collagen and thus are critical for the stability of intermolecular crosslinks. Some patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VI have deficiencies in lysyl hydroxylase activity. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.41).
BP6
Variant 1-11949898-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-11949898-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 255803.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-11949898-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.08 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.415 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PLOD1NM_000302.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.294C>T p.Phe98= synonymous_variant 3/19 ENST00000196061.5 NP_000293.2
PLOD1NM_001316320.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.435C>T p.Phe145= synonymous_variant 4/20 NP_001303249.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PLOD1ENST00000196061.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.294C>T p.Phe98= synonymous_variant 3/191 NM_000302.4 ENSP00000196061 P1Q02809-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.254
AC:
38595
AN:
151958
Hom.:
6298
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0637
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.138
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.289
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.215
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.378
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.432
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.437
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.253
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.315
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.274
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.329
AC:
82814
AN:
251354
Hom.:
14831
AF XY:
0.336
AC XY:
45707
AN XY:
135858
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0589
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.352
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.220
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.375
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.424
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.446
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.316
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.331
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.317
AC:
463265
AN:
1461332
Hom.:
76390
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.321
AC XY:
233607
AN XY:
726970
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0541
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.351
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.220
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.343
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.428
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.446
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.311
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.309
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.254
AC:
38608
AN:
152076
Hom.:
6299
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.262
AC XY:
19467
AN XY:
74308
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0635
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.289
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.215
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.378
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.431
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.437
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.315
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.277
Alfa
AF:
0.294
Hom.:
9069
Bravo
AF:
0.231
Asia WGS
AF:
0.390
AC:
1354
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 04, 2023- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 29, 2016- -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, kyphoscoliotic type 1 Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabOct 25, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJul 30, 2020- -
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 23, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.41
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.82
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs7529452; hg19: chr1-12009955; COSMIC: COSV52144592; COSMIC: COSV52144592; API