rs753062989

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_001405760.1(OR52I2):c.475G>T(p.Ala159Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000562 in 1,458,126 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 33 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A159V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00068 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000056 ( 33 hom. )

Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

OR52I2
NM_001405760.1 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.84

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

OR52I2 (HGNC:15221): (olfactory receptor family 52 subfamily I member 2) Olfactory receptors interact with odorant molecules in the nose, to initiate a neuronal response that triggers the perception of a smell. The olfactory receptor proteins are members of a large family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) arising from single coding-exon genes. Olfactory receptors share a 7-transmembrane domain structure with many neurotransmitter and hormone receptors and are responsible for the recognition and G protein-mediated transduction of odorant signals. The olfactory receptor gene family is the largest in the genome. The nomenclature assigned to the olfactory receptor genes and proteins for this organism is independent of other organisms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

OR52I2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015146345).

BP6

Variant 11-4587365-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-4587365-G-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 2344611.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 33 AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001405760.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	OR52I2	NM_001405760.1	MANE Select	c.475G>T	p.Ala159Ser	missense	Exon 2 of 2	NP_001392689.1	A0A126GWK8
	OR52I2	NM_001005170.4		c.475G>T	p.Ala159Ser	missense	Exon 1 of 1	NP_001005170.2	A0A126GWK8

Ensembl Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	OR52I2	ENST00000641896.1	MANE Select	c.475G>T	p.Ala159Ser	missense	Exon 2 of 2	ENSP00000493402.1	A0A126GWK8
	OR52I2	ENST00000641486.1		c.475G>T	p.Ala159Ser	missense	Exon 1 of 1	ENSP00000493314.1	A0A126GWK8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000680

AC:

100

AN:

147130

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00245

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000332

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00148

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000717

AC:

AN:

251166

AF XY:

0.0000884

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00111

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000562

AC:

AN:

1458126

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000537

AC XY:

AN XY:

725602

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00239

AC:

AN:

30532

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000449

AC:

AN:

44568

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26078

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000348

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5732

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1111796

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000666

AC:

AN:

60048

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.238

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR

AF:

0.000679

AC:

100

AN:

147240

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000693

AC XY:

AN XY:

72136

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00245

AC:

AN:

36788

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000331

AC:

AN:

15096

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000288

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

290

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68002

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00146

AC:

AN:

2054

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.255

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000432

Hom.:

ExAC

AF:

0.000107

AC:

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Revision:criteria provided, conflicting classifications

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

not provided (1)

not specified (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.12

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.27

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.63

CADD

Benign

0.055

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.60

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.0013

Eigen

Benign

-2.3

Eigen_PC

Benign

-2.4

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.0057

LIST_S2

Benign

0.29

M_CAP

Benign

0.0094

MetaRNN

Benign

0.015

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.18

PhyloP100

-4.8

PrimateAI

Benign

0.23

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.66

REVEL

Benign

0.083

Sift

Benign

0.16

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.060

Polyphen

0.027

Vest4

0.021

MutPred

0.34

Gain of glycosylation at A185 (P = 0.0298)

MVP

0.41

MPC

0.16

ClinPred

0.033

GERP RS

-8.4

Varity_R

0.058

gMVP

0.12

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over