rs753502762
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_005864.4(EFS):c.1028G>A(p.Arg343His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000659 in 515,892 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R343C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005864.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005864.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFS | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1028G>A | p.Arg343His | missense | Exon 4 of 6 | ENSP00000216733.3 | O43281-1 | ||
| EFS | TSL:1 | c.749G>A | p.Arg250His | missense | Exon 3 of 5 | ENSP00000340607.3 | O43281-2 | ||
| EFS | c.1028G>A | p.Arg343His | missense | Exon 4 of 5 | ENSP00000593612.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000179 AC: 2AN: 111628Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000481 AC: 9AN: 187276 AF XY: 0.0000478 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000792 AC: 32AN: 404264Hom.: 0 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.0000919 AC XY: 20AN XY: 217592 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000179 AC: 2AN: 111628Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 54990 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at