rs753512842
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):āc.1355T>Cā(p.Leu452Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000274 in 1,459,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L452I) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.1355T>C | p.Leu452Pro | missense_variant | 10/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.1355T>C | p.Leu452Pro | missense_variant | 10/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000404 AC: 1AN: 247608Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000746 AC XY: 1AN XY: 134046
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1459026Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00000276 AC XY: 2AN XY: 725666
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jul 27, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Mar 23, 2023 | Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Aug 05, 2020 | This missense variant replaces leucine with proline at codon 452 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/247608 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 13, 2022 | The p.L452P variant (also known as c.1355T>C), located in coding exon 9 of the BRCA2 gene, results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 1355. The leucine at codon 452 is replaced by proline, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 10, 2015 | This variant is denoted BRCA2 c.1355T>C at the cDNA level, p.Leu452Pro (L452P) at the protein level, and results in the change of a Leucine to a Proline (CTA>CCA). Using alternate nomenclature, this variant would be defined as BRCA2 1583T>C. This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as pathogenic or benign. BRCA2 Leu452Pro was not observed in approximately 6,500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, indicating it is not a common benign variant in these populations. Since Leucine and Proline differ in some properties, this is considered a semi-conservative amino acid substitution. BRCA2 Leu452Pro occurs at a position that is not conserved and is not located in a known functional domain (UniProt). In silico analyses predict that this variant is unlikely to alter protein structure or function. Based on currently available information, it is unclear whether BRCA2 Leu452Pro is pathogenic or benign. We consider it to be a variant of uncertain significance. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 12, 2023 | In a large scale breast cancer association study, the variant was observed in an individual with breast cancer as well as in unaffected individuals (PMID: 33471991 (2021)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000004 (1/247608 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan | Apr 21, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Nov 30, 2023 | This missense variant replaces leucine with proline at codon 452 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/247608 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 16, 2023 | This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 452 of the BRCA2 protein (p.Leu452Pro). This variant is present in population databases (rs753512842, gnomAD 0.0009%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of BRCA2-related conditions (PMID: 21520333). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 225738). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BRCA2 protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at