rs75369104

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_005199.5(CHRNG):​c.951C>A​(p.Ile317=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0101 in 1,613,384 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 175 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.010 ( 23 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.010 ( 152 hom. )

Consequence

CHRNG
NM_005199.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0590
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHRNG (HGNC:1967): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic gamma subunit) The mammalian muscle-type acetylcholine receptor is a transmembrane pentameric glycoprotein with two alpha subunits, one beta, one delta, and one epsilon (in adult skeletal muscle) or gamma (in fetal and denervated muscle) subunit. This gene, which encodes the gamma subunit, is expressed prior to the thirty-third week of gestation in humans. The gamma subunit of the acetylcholine receptor plays a role in neuromuscular organogenesis and ligand binding and disruption of gamma subunit expression prevents the correct localization of the receptor in cell membranes. Mutations in this gene cause Escobar syndrome and a lethal form of multiple pterygium syndrome. Muscle-type acetylcholine receptor is the major antigen in the autoimmune disease myasthenia gravis.[provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).
BP6
Variant 2-232543615-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-232543615-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 199105.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=4, Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr2-232543615-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.059 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0102 (1554/152274) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0346 (179/5170). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0305. There are 23 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 811 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 23 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CHRNGNM_005199.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.951C>A p.Ile317= synonymous_variant 9/12 ENST00000651502.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CHRNGENST00000651502.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.951C>A p.Ile317= synonymous_variant 9/12 NM_005199.5 P1P07510-1
CHRNGENST00000389492.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.795C>A p.Ile265= synonymous_variant 8/111 P07510-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0102
AC:
1555
AN:
152156
Hom.:
24
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0232
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0351
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00477
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0252
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00936
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0120
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0140
AC:
3522
AN:
251350
Hom.:
39
AF XY:
0.0125
AC XY:
1700
AN XY:
135880
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0343
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00386
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0255
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00902
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0140
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0101
AC:
14780
AN:
1461110
Hom.:
152
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00987
AC XY:
7177
AN XY:
726898
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000986
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0338
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00107
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0360
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00435
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0254
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00844
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0107
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0102
AC:
1554
AN:
152274
Hom.:
23
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0109
AC XY:
811
AN XY:
74450
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00149
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0231
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0346
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00519
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0252
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00936
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0118
Alfa
AF:
0.00844
Hom.:
5
Bravo
AF:
0.0107
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0230
AC:
79
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00851
EpiControl
AF:
0.00777

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 10, 2014- -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 12, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Autosomal recessive multiple pterygium syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Lethal multiple pterygium syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.37
CADD
Benign
9.1
DANN
Benign
0.81

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.080
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs75369104; hg19: chr2-233408325; COSMIC: COSV67315592; COSMIC: COSV67315592; API