rs7539596
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The ENST00000638118.1(REN):c.-17+729C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.546 in 152,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 24,066 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000638118.1 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy type 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- renal tubular dysgenesis of genetic originInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: ENST00000638118.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
There are no transcript annotations for this variant. | |||||||||
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REN | ENST00000638118.1 | TSL:5 | c.-17+729C>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000490307.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.546 AC: 83000AN: 151960Hom.: 24019 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.546 AC: 83101AN: 152078Hom.: 24066 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.543 AC XY: 40371AN XY: 74316 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at