rs754050093
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The ENST00000307128.6(MYOZ2):c.363C>A(p.Asp121Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000131 in 152,174 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D121G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000307128.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYOZ2 | NM_016599.5 | c.363C>A | p.Asp121Glu | missense_variant | 4/6 | ENST00000307128.6 | NP_057683.1 | |
MYOZ2 | XM_006714234.5 | c.363C>A | p.Asp121Glu | missense_variant | 4/6 | XP_006714297.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYOZ2 | ENST00000307128.6 | c.363C>A | p.Asp121Glu | missense_variant | 4/6 | 1 | NM_016599.5 | ENSP00000306997 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251340Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 135830
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 35
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152174Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74346
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at