Menu
GeneBe

rs754092062

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_006206.6(PDGFRA):c.17C>T(p.Pro6Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000688 in 1,613,438 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P6P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000079 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000068 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PDGFRA
NM_006206.6 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0730
Variant links:
Genes affected
PDGFRA (HGNC:8803): (platelet derived growth factor receptor alpha) This gene encodes a cell surface tyrosine kinase receptor for members of the platelet-derived growth factor family. These growth factors are mitogens for cells of mesenchymal origin. The identity of the growth factor bound to a receptor monomer determines whether the functional receptor is a homodimer or a heterodimer, composed of both platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha and beta polypeptides. Studies suggest that this gene plays a role in organ development, wound healing, and tumor progression. Mutations in this gene have been associated with idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, somatic and familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and a variety of other cancers. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, PDGFRA
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.027269483).
BP6
Variant 4-54258785-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-54258785-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 240317.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 12 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
PDGFRANM_006206.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.17C>T p.Pro6Leu missense_variant 2/23 ENST00000257290.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
PDGFRAENST00000257290.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.17C>T p.Pro6Leu missense_variant 2/231 NM_006206.6 P1P16234-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000789
AC:
12
AN:
152162
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000596
AC:
15
AN:
251476
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135916
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000992
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000677
AC:
99
AN:
1461276
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0000633
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
727014
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000880
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000756
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000696
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000513
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000149
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000789
AC:
12
AN:
152162
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000673
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74318
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000180
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000793
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0000659
AC:
8
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 24, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 14, 2019The p.P6L variant (also known as c.17C>T), located in coding exon 1 of the PDGFRA gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 17. The proline at codon 6 is replaced by leucine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan UniversityJan 01, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.078
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.19
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.41
Cadd
Benign
0.47
Dann
Benign
0.71
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.051
T;.;T;.;.;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.4
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.4
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.028
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.68
T;T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.020
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.027
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
N;N;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.63
N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.043
Sift
Benign
0.48
T;T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.29
T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.11
MutPred
0.39
Loss of loop (P = 0.0128);Loss of loop (P = 0.0128);.;Loss of loop (P = 0.0128);Loss of loop (P = 0.0128);Loss of loop (P = 0.0128);
MVP
0.77
MPC
0.33
ClinPred
0.075
T
GERP RS
-4.5
Varity_R
0.027
gMVP
0.42

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs754092062; hg19: chr4-55124952; COSMIC: COSV57271813; API