rs754312807
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 7 ACMG points: 8P and 1B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3BP6
The NM_001035.3(RYR2):c.836C>A(p.Thr279Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000132 in 152,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T279M) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001035.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR2 | NM_001035.3 | c.836C>A | p.Thr279Lys | missense_variant | 11/105 | ENST00000366574.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR2 | ENST00000366574.7 | c.836C>A | p.Thr279Lys | missense_variant | 11/105 | 1 | NM_001035.3 | P1 | |
RYR2 | ENST00000660292.2 | c.836C>A | p.Thr279Lys | missense_variant | 11/106 | ||||
RYR2 | ENST00000659194.3 | c.836C>A | p.Thr279Lys | missense_variant | 11/105 | ||||
RYR2 | ENST00000609119.2 | c.836C>A | p.Thr279Lys | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 11/104 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152046Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 1460996Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726830
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152046Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74278
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Aug 15, 2023 | This missense variant replaces threonine with lysine at codon 279 of the RYR2 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with cardiovascular disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/31382 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Aug 25, 2020 | This missense variant replaces threonine with lysine at codon 279 of the RYR2 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with cardiovascular disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 1/31382 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Aug 20, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at