rs754562075

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2

The NM_000251.3(MSH2):​c.11A>C​(p.Gln4Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Likely benign in ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q4K) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 33)

Consequence

MSH2
NM_000251.3 missense

Scores

4
12
3

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.21

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
MSH2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Lynch syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Lynch syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
  • Muir-Torre syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, G2P
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • mismatch repair cancer syndrome 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • malignant pancreatic neoplasm
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • rhabdomyosarcoma
    Inheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • breast cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MSH2NM_000251.3 linkc.11A>C p.Gln4Pro missense_variant Exon 1 of 16 ENST00000233146.7 NP_000242.1 P43246-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MSH2ENST00000233146.7 linkc.11A>C p.Gln4Pro missense_variant Exon 1 of 16 1 NM_000251.3 ENSP00000233146.2 P43246-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
33
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
31
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
33

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Nov 18, 2023
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Jun 06, 2019
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Mar 11, 2024
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:1
Aug 14, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Not observed in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Uncertain:1
May 16, 2019
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with MSH2-related disease. This sequence change replaces glutamine with proline at codon 4 of the MSH2 protein (p.Gln4Pro). The glutamine residue is moderately conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between glutamine and proline. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.21
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.32
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.22
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.55
D;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.19
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.31
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.94
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.64
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.62
D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.76
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
2.0
M;.;.
PhyloP100
4.2
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.61
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.4
N;.;N
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.68
Sift
Uncertain
0.0080
D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.055
T;.;T
Polyphen
0.013
B;.;D
Vest4
0.39
MutPred
0.29
Gain of glycosylation at Q4 (P = 0.0189);Gain of glycosylation at Q4 (P = 0.0189);Gain of glycosylation at Q4 (P = 0.0189);
MVP
0.94
MPC
0.010
ClinPred
0.96
D
GERP RS
5.5
PromoterAI
0.035
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.92
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.7
Varity_R
0.89
gMVP
0.53
Mutation Taster
=76/24
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs754562075; hg19: chr2-47630341; API