rs75477151
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_019032.6(ADAMTSL4):c.1098G>A(p.Gly366Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00299 in 1,601,516 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 81 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_019032.6 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00490 AC: 745AN: 152134Hom.: 8 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00903 AC: 2121AN: 234856Hom.: 39 AF XY: 0.00773 AC XY: 999AN XY: 129272
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00279 AC: 4044AN: 1449264Hom.: 73 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00265 AC XY: 1914AN XY: 721324
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00488 AC: 743AN: 152252Hom.: 8 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00558 AC XY: 415AN XY: 74422
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
Ectopia lentis 2, isolated, autosomal recessive Benign:2
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
not specified Benign:1
- -
Ectopia lentis et pupillae Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at