rs75542756

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000393.5(COL5A2):c.3098C>T(p.Pro1033Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00146 in 1,613,676 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 49 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0013 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0015 ( 46 hom. )

Consequence

COL5A2
NM_000393.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.73

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL5A2 (HGNC:2210): (collagen type V alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes an alpha chain for one of the low abundance fibrillar collagens. Fibrillar collagen molecules are trimers that can be composed of one or more types of alpha chains. Type V collagen is found in tissues containing type I collagen and appears to regulate the assembly of heterotypic fibers composed of both type I and type V collagen. This gene product is closely related to type XI collagen and it is possible that the collagen chains of types V and XI constitute a single collagen type with tissue-specific chain combinations. Mutations in this gene are associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, types I and II. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

COL5A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp

COL5A2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009112537).

BP6

Variant 2-189049396-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-189049396-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 136949.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00133 (202/152308) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0359 (186/5176). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0317. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 103 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 202 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein
COL5A2	NM_000393.5 link	c.3098C>T	p.Pro1033Leu	missense_variant	Exon 44 of 54	ENST00000374866.9	NP_000384.2
COL5A2	XM_011510573.4 link	c.2960C>T	p.Pro987Leu	missense_variant	Exon 47 of 57		XP_011508875.1
COL5A2	XM_047443251.1 link	c.2960C>T	p.Pro987Leu	missense_variant	Exon 49 of 59		XP_047299207.1
COL5A2	XM_047443252.1 link	c.2960C>T	p.Pro987Leu	missense_variant	Exon 48 of 58		XP_047299208.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
COL5A2	ENST00000374866.9 link	c.3098C>T	p.Pro1033Leu	missense_variant	Exon 44 of 54	1	NM_000393.5	ENSP00000364000.3
COL5A2	ENST00000618828.1 link	c.1937C>T	p.Pro646Leu	missense_variant	Exon 37 of 47	5		ENSP00000482184.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00134

AC:

204

AN:

152190

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0362

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00186

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00251

AC:

629

AN:

250228

AF XY:

0.00254

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000116

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0313

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000884

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00213

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00147

AC:

2151

AN:

1461368

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00152

AC XY:

1103

AN XY:

726900

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000134

AC:

AN:

44714

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26116

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0479

AC:

1902

AN:

39686

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00110

AC:

AN:

86060

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53358

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000171

AC:

AN:

1111826

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00214

AC:

129

AN:

60364

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.486

Heterozygous variant carriers

118

235

353

470

588

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

150

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00133

AC:

202

AN:

152308

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00138

AC XY:

103

AN XY:

74476

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41576

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15308

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0359

AC:

186

AN:

5176

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00187

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10620

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68014

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00237

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00140

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00123

ExAC

AF:

0.00237

AC:

288

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0230

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Jul 02, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Jul 21, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 2

Benign:2

Apr 25, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:1

Sep 24, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 7A

Benign:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

Benign:1

Dec 01, 2019

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1

Benign:1

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.083

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.14

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.090

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Pathogenic

0.82

D;T;D

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.73

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.76

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

LIST_S2

Benign

0.0

.;D;D

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0091

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.00080

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.7

L;.;L

PhyloP100

9.7

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.68

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-6.0

D;.;.

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.67

Sift

Benign

0.033

D;.;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.069

T;T;.

Vest4

0.63

ClinPred

0.086

GERP RS

5.4

Varity_R

0.25

gMVP

0.41

Mutation Taster

=30/70

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over