rs755627156
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.1308C>T(p.Pro436Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000616 in 1,461,536 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P436P) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006231.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- POLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
- IMAGe syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POLE | NM_006231.4 | c.1308C>T | p.Pro436Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 13 of 49 | ENST00000320574.10 | NP_006222.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POLE | ENST00000320574.10 | c.1308C>T | p.Pro436Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 13 of 49 | 1 | NM_006231.4 | ENSP00000322570.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251188 AF XY: 0.0000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000616 AC: 90AN: 1461536Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000523 AC XY: 38AN XY: 727088 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016; McVean et al., 2012; Exome Variant Server); In-silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27149842) -
- -
- -
POLE: BP4, BP7 -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:1
This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -
POLE-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at