Menu
GeneBe

rs755793

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000141.5(FGFR2):c.557T>C(p.Met186Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0239 in 1,614,158 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,341 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.099 ( 2074 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.016 ( 2267 hom. )

Consequence

FGFR2
NM_000141.5 missense

Scores

17

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.850
Variant links:
Genes affected
FGFR2 (HGNC:3689): (fibroblast growth factor receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the fibroblast growth factor receptor family, where amino acid sequence is highly conserved between members and throughout evolution. FGFR family members differ from one another in their ligand affinities and tissue distribution. A full-length representative protein consists of an extracellular region, composed of three immunoglobulin-like domains, a single hydrophobic membrane-spanning segment and a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain. The extracellular portion of the protein interacts with fibroblast growth factors, setting in motion a cascade of downstream signals, ultimately influencing mitogenesis and differentiation. This particular family member is a high-affinity receptor for acidic, basic and/or keratinocyte growth factor, depending on the isoform. Mutations in this gene are associated with Crouzon syndrome, Pfeiffer syndrome, Craniosynostosis, Apert syndrome, Jackson-Weiss syndrome, Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome, Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and syndromic craniosynostosis. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, FGFR2
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0021749437).
BP6
Variant 10-121551357-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-121551357-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 134392.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr10-121551357-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-121551357-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.303 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
FGFR2NM_022970.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.557T>C p.Met186Thr missense_variant 5/18 ENST00000457416.7
FGFR2NM_000141.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.557T>C p.Met186Thr missense_variant 5/18 ENST00000358487.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
FGFR2ENST00000457416.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.557T>C p.Met186Thr missense_variant 5/181 NM_022970.4 P4P21802-3
FGFR2ENST00000358487.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.557T>C p.Met186Thr missense_variant 5/181 NM_000141.5 A2P21802-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0991
AC:
15077
AN:
152148
Hom.:
2056
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.307
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0406
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0810
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0740
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00786
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0302
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00238
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0736
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0454
AC:
11423
AN:
251474
Hom.:
1083
AF XY:
0.0360
AC XY:
4891
AN XY:
135912
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.315
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.104
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00377
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0790
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00366
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0295
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00259
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0290
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0161
AC:
23507
AN:
1461892
Hom.:
2267
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0142
AC XY:
10326
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.320
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.103
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00287
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0732
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00379
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0289
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00128
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0300
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0994
AC:
15142
AN:
152266
Hom.:
2074
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0987
AC XY:
7349
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.308
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0818
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0732
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00787
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0302
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00238
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0733
Alfa
AF:
0.0213
Hom.:
739
Bravo
AF:
0.115
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00108
AC:
4
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00182
AC:
7
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.294
AC:
1295
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00174
AC:
15
ExAC
AF:
0.0473
AC:
5745
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0560
AC:
196
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00234
EpiControl
AF:
0.00273

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAl Jalila Children's Genomics Center, Al Jalila Childrens Speciality HospitalMar 25, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Oct 04, 2015- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 06, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMay 24, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsJul 22, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
FGFR2-related craniosynostosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Crouzon syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Isolated coronal synostosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Craniosynostosis syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Saethre-Chotzen syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.054
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.51
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.36
Cadd
Benign
14
Dann
Benign
0.31
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.95
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.013
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.17
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0022
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.72
N;.;.;N;.;N;.;N;.;N;.;N;N;.;N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.41
T
PROVEAN
Benign
1.3
N;N;.;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.17
Sift
Benign
0.14
T;T;.;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.81
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;.;T
Polyphen
0.0
.;B;.;B;B;.;.;.;.;.;B;B;.;.;.
Vest4
0.087
MPC
0.87
ClinPred
0.00016
T
GERP RS
3.9
Varity_R
0.092
gMVP
0.46

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs755793; hg19: chr10-123310871; COSMIC: COSV60642616; API