rs756533557
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PP2PP3
The NM_001278716.2(FBXL4):c.46T>C(p.Tyr16His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,461,852 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. Y16Y) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001278716.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Leigh syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 13Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251014 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1461852Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727228 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 13 Uncertain:1
The NM_012160.4:c.46T>C (NP_036292.2:p.Tyr16His) [GRCH38: NC_000006.12:g.98926943A>G] variant in FBXL4 gene is interpretated to be a Uncertain Significance - Insufficient Evidence based on ACMG guidelines (PMID: 25741868). This variant meets one or more of the following evidence codes reported in the ACMG-guideline. PM2:This variant is absent in key population databases. Based on this evidence code ClinGen Pathogenicity Calculator (PMID:28081714) suggested that the variant is Uncertain Significance - Insufficient Evidence. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at