rs756708148
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_001048174.2(MUTYH):āc.1533T>Cā(p.Thr511=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000342 in 1,461,888 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 31)
Exomes š: 0.0000034 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
MUTYH
NM_001048174.2 synonymous
NM_001048174.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.442
Genes affected
MUTYH (HGNC:7527): (mutY DNA glycosylase) This gene encodes a DNA glycosylase involved in oxidative DNA damage repair. The enzyme excises adenine bases from the DNA backbone at sites where adenine is inappropriately paired with guanine, cytosine, or 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, a major oxidatively damaged DNA lesion. The protein is localized to the nucleus and mitochondria. This gene product is thought to play a role in signaling apoptosis by the introduction of single-strand breaks following oxidative damage. Mutations in this gene result in heritable predisposition to colorectal cancer, termed MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
PM2
?
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
?
Variant 1-45329339-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-45329339-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 184193.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.442 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUTYH | NM_001128425.2 | c.1617T>C | p.Thr539= | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000710952.2 | |
MUTYH | NM_001048174.2 | c.1533T>C | p.Thr511= | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000456914.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUTYH | ENST00000710952.2 | c.1617T>C | p.Thr539= | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | NM_001128425.2 | |||
MUTYH | ENST00000456914.7 | c.1533T>C | p.Thr511= | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | 1 | NM_001048174.2 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
?
Cov.:
31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000795 AC: 2AN: 251494Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000147 AC XY: 2AN XY: 135922
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
251494
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
135922
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1461888Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
1461888
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
727244
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome
?
Cov.:
31
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Familial adenomatous polyposis 2 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 09, 2016 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | May 15, 2018 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 07, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at