Menu
GeneBe

rs756859993

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 2P and 7B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6BS2

The NM_000038.6(APC):c.1984C>A(p.Leu662Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000186 in 1,612,798 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L662L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000018 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

APC
NM_000038.6 missense

Scores

2
7
8

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.03
Variant links:
Genes affected
APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

PM1
In a repeat ARM 5 (size 44) in uniprot entity APC_HUMAN there are 13 pathogenic changes around while only 4 benign (76%) in NM_000038.6
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.16446969).
BP6
Variant 5-112837578-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112837578-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 232098.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=4, Benign=1, Likely_benign=4}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome at 17 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
APCNM_000038.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1984C>A p.Leu662Ile missense_variant 16/16 ENST00000257430.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
APCENST00000257430.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1984C>A p.Leu662Ile missense_variant 16/165 NM_000038.6 P1P25054-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152192
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000678
AC:
17
AN:
250674
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000516
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
135552
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000871
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000185
AC:
27
AN:
1460606
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000193
AC XY:
14
AN XY:
726402
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000605
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
9.00e-7
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000197
AC:
3
AN:
152192
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000135
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74348
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000604
ExAC
AF:
0.0000576
AC:
7

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJul 02, 2018- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Feb 15, 2023This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 19, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMay 08, 2018- -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJun 17, 2019Variant summary: APC c.1984C>A (p.Leu662Ile) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the Armadillo repeat (IPR000225) of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 6.8e-05 in 250674 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in APC causing Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (6.8e-05 vs 7.1e-05), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, c.1984C>A has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. This variant has been reported in individuals with familial non-medullary thyroid cancer (Yu_2015), metanephric adenoma (Ding_2018), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (Deng_2019), and schozphrenia (Yang_2017). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineMar 20, 2017The p.Leu662Ile variant in APC has not been previously reported in individuals w ith APC associated disorders, but has been identified in 7/8576 East Asian chrom osomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org ; dbSNP rs756859993). Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis d o not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary , the clinical significance of the p.Leu662Ile variant is uncertain. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 31, 2021This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 19, 2019- -
Duodenal adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testing3DMed Clinical Laboratory IncMar 20, 2017- -
Rectum adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testing3DMed Clinical Laboratory IncMar 20, 2017- -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 04, 2019In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26530882, 28195569, 30111351, 30833958, 27882345, 28944238, 28706299) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.49
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.20
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.14
Cadd
Benign
20
Dann
Uncertain
0.99
Eigen
Uncertain
0.49
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.44
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
D;.;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.058
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.16
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.37
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.81
D
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.9
N;N;N;N;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.40
Sift
Benign
0.077
T;D;D;T;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.010
D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
0.99
.;D;D;.;.
Vest4
0.66, 0.61
MVP
0.70
ClinPred
0.18
T
GERP RS
2.8
Varity_R
0.83
gMVP
0.60

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.050
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs756859993; hg19: chr5-112173275; COSMIC: COSV99072990; API