rs757077698
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_ModeratePP5
The ENST00000355300.7(LINGO1):c.869G>A(p.Arg290His) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000112 in 1,613,842 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R290C) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000355300.7 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINGO1 | NM_032808.7 | c.869G>A | p.Arg290His | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000355300.7 | NP_116197.4 | |
LOC105370906 | XR_001751806.2 | n.689-15247C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LINGO1 | ENST00000355300.7 | c.869G>A | p.Arg290His | missense_variant | 2/2 | 1 | NM_032808.7 | ENSP00000347451 | A1 | |
LINGO1 | ENST00000561030.5 | c.851G>A | p.Arg284His | missense_variant | 4/4 | 1 | ENSP00000453853 | P4 | ||
LINGO1 | ENST00000557798.1 | c.884G>A | p.Arg295His | missense_variant | 2/2 | 3 | ENSP00000453780 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000958 AC: 14AN: 1461706Hom.: 0 Cov.: 55 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 727136
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74314
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Intellectual disability, autosomal recessive 64 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Aug 29, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at