rs757389650
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):c.3616G>A(p.Glu1206Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000415 in 1,540,606 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E1206Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001134363.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- dilated cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- dilated cardiomyopathy 1DDInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
- familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hypertrophic cardiomyopathyInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBM20 | NM_001134363.3 | c.3616G>A | p.Glu1206Lys | missense_variant | Exon 14 of 14 | ENST00000369519.4 | NP_001127835.2 | |
| RBM20 | XM_017016103.3 | c.3451G>A | p.Glu1151Lys | missense_variant | Exon 14 of 14 | XP_016871592.1 | ||
| RBM20 | XM_017016104.3 | c.3232G>A | p.Glu1078Lys | missense_variant | Exon 14 of 14 | XP_016871593.1 | ||
| RBM20 | XM_047425116.1 | c.3232G>A | p.Glu1078Lys | missense_variant | Exon 14 of 14 | XP_047281072.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBM20 | ENST00000369519.4 | c.3616G>A | p.Glu1206Lys | missense_variant | Exon 14 of 14 | 1 | NM_001134363.3 | ENSP00000358532.3 | ||
| RBM20 | ENST00000718239.1 | c.3616G>A | p.Glu1206Lys | missense_variant | Exon 14 of 14 | ENSP00000520684.1 | ||||
| RBM20 | ENST00000465774.2 | n.557G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 2 | 4 | |||||
| RBM20 | ENST00000480343.2 | n.249G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152232Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000467 AC: 7AN: 149856 AF XY: 0.0000251 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000382 AC: 53AN: 1388374Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.0000350 AC XY: 24AN XY: 685420 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152232Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000108 AC XY: 8AN XY: 74372 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: RBM20 c.3616G>A (p.Glu1206Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.7e-05 in 149856 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.3616G>A has been reported in the literature in one individual affected with Dilated Cardiomyopathy, without strong evidence for causality (Refaat_2012). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Dilated Cardiomyopathy. One publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on mouse protein function, however, does not allow convincing conclusions about the variant effect (Murayama_2018). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 29895960, 22004663). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 418455). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
RBM20-related disorder Uncertain:1
The RBM20 c.3616G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Glu1206Lys. This variant was reported in an individual with dilated cardiomyopathy (Refaat et al. 2012. PubMed ID: 22004663). Functional studies in a mouse homolog (p.Glu1178Lys) showed that this variant may moderately affect the protein function (Figure 6, Murayama et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 29895960). This variant is reported in 0.013% of alleles in individuals of South Asian descent in gnomAD. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Primary familial dilated cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
- -
not provided Uncertain:1
Observed in a patient with DCM in the published literature (PMID: 22004663); Published functional studies are inconclusive in determining a damaging effect (PMID: 29895960); In silico analysis suggests that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30547036, 38927106, 22004663, 29895960, 33671899) -
Cardiovascular phenotype Uncertain:1
The p.E1206K variant (also known as c.3616G>A), located in coding exon 14 of the RBM20 gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 3616. The glutamic acid at codon 1206 is replaced by lysine, an amino acid with similar properties. This variant was detected in a dilated cardiomyopathy cohort; however, details were limited (Refaat MM et al. Heart Rhythm, 2012 Mar;9:390-6). One study of the equivalent variant in a mouse expression vector did not indicate a significant impact on the RBM20 properties studied (Murayama R et al. Sci Rep, 2018 Jun;8:8970). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species; however, lysine is the reference amino acid in other vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at