rs75782436

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_152383.5(DIS3L2):​c.2187C>T​(p.Pro729Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0317 in 1,613,586 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 994 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.043 ( 188 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.031 ( 806 hom. )

Consequence

DIS3L2
NM_152383.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.02

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DIS3L2 (HGNC:28648): (DIS3 like 3'-5' exoribonuclease 2) The protein encoded by this gene is similar in sequence to 3'/5' exonucleolytic subunits of the RNA exosome. The exosome is a large multimeric ribonucleotide complex responsible for degrading various RNA substrates. Several transcript variants, some protein-coding and some not, have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
DIS3L2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Perlman syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (REVEL=0.006).
BP6
Variant 2-232334397-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-232334397-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 334945.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.02 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0734 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_152383.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
DIS3L2
NM_152383.5
MANE Select
c.2187C>Tp.Pro729Pro
synonymous
Exon 18 of 21NP_689596.4
DIS3L2
NR_046476.2
n.2260C>T
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 18 of 21
DIS3L2
NR_046477.2
n.2239C>T
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 17 of 19

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
DIS3L2
ENST00000325385.12
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.2187C>Tp.Pro729Pro
synonymous
Exon 18 of 21ENSP00000315569.7
DIS3L2
ENST00000390005.9
TSL:1
n.*254C>T
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 18 of 21ENSP00000374655.5
DIS3L2
ENST00000445090.5
TSL:1
n.*1343C>T
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 17 of 19ENSP00000388999.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0432
AC:
6571
AN:
152144
Hom.:
188
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0756
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0559
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0301
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0487
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0193
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0342
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0443
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0324
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0397
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0308
AC:
7638
AN:
248298
AF XY:
0.0303
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0765
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0214
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0469
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00178
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0382
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0306
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0396
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0306
AC:
44647
AN:
1461324
Hom.:
806
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0306
AC XY:
22219
AN XY:
726962
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0779
AC:
2608
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0217
AC:
971
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0487
AC:
1273
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00121
AC:
48
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0234
AC:
2020
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0371
AC:
1965
AN:
52946
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0432
AC:
249
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0301
AC:
33456
AN:
1111954
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0341
AC:
2057
AN:
60376
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.468
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2621
5242
7862
10483
13104
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1240
2480
3720
4960
6200
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0432
AC:
6583
AN:
152262
Hom.:
188
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0424
AC XY:
3160
AN XY:
74446
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0756
AC:
3142
AN:
41550
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0301
AC:
460
AN:
15306
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0487
AC:
169
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00116
AC:
6
AN:
5164
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0197
AC:
95
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0342
AC:
363
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0442
AC:
13
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0324
AC:
2201
AN:
68010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0393
AC:
83
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
326
653
979
1306
1632
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
74
148
222
296
370
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0395
Hom.:
66
Bravo
AF:
0.0446
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0150
AC:
51
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0291
EpiControl
AF:
0.0277

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Perlman syndrome Benign:2
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

not provided Benign:2
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Feb 24, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
3.7
DANN
Benign
0.72
PhyloP100
-2.0
PromoterAI
-0.021
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.070
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs75782436; hg19: chr2-233199107; API