rs758191113
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM1BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_006158.5(NEFL):āc.338A>Cā(p.Gln113Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000143 in 1,610,342 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00014 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
NEFL
NM_006158.5 missense
NM_006158.5 missense
Scores
4
4
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.18
Genes affected
NEFL (HGNC:7739): (neurofilament light chain) Neurofilaments are type IV intermediate filament heteropolymers composed of light, medium, and heavy chains. Neurofilaments comprise the axoskeleton and they functionally maintain the neuronal caliber. They may also play a role in intracellular transport to axons and dendrites. This gene encodes the light chain neurofilament protein. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease types 1F (CMT1F) and 2E (CMT2E), disorders of the peripheral nervous system that are characterized by distinct neuropathies. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome Y. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
PM1
In a region_of_interest Coil 1A (size 31) in uniprot entity NFL_HUMAN there are 7 pathogenic changes around while only 0 benign (100%) in NM_006158.5
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.18910345).
BP6
Variant 8-24956178-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-24956178-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 910601.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEFL | NM_006158.5 | c.338A>C | p.Gln113Pro | missense_variant | 1/4 | ENST00000610854.2 | NP_006149.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEFL | ENST00000610854.2 | c.338A>C | p.Gln113Pro | missense_variant | 1/4 | 1 | NM_006158.5 | ENSP00000482169 | P1 | |
ENST00000607735.2 | n.238T>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/1 | |||||||
NEFL | ENST00000615973.1 | n.544A>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000125 AC: 19AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
19
AN:
152188
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000283 AC: 68AN: 240546Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000298 AC XY: 39AN XY: 130912
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
68
AN:
240546
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
39
AN XY:
130912
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000145 AC: 211AN: 1458154Hom.: 0 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.000154 AC XY: 112AN XY: 725020
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
211
AN:
1458154
Hom.:
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
AC XY:
112
AN XY:
725020
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000125 AC: 19AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74334
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
19
AN:
152188
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74334
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
AC:
20
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1F Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 10, 2023 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
D;.;T
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;.;D
Polyphen
D;.;.
Vest4
MVP
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at