rs7585742
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_024782.3(NHEJ1):c.391-59C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.601 in 1,573,286 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 293,576 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024782.3 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Cernunnos-XLF deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHEJ1 | NM_024782.3 | c.391-59C>G | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 7 | ENST00000356853.10 | NP_079058.1 | ||
| NHEJ1 | NM_001377499.1 | c.391-59C>G | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 7 | NP_001364428.1 | |||
| NHEJ1 | NM_001377498.1 | c.391-59C>G | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 7 | NP_001364427.1 | |||
| NHEJ1 | NR_165304.1 | n.487-59C>G | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 8 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.503 AC: 76427AN: 151992Hom.: 21570 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.612 AC: 869417AN: 1421178Hom.: 272006 AF XY: 0.612 AC XY: 433586AN XY: 708858 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.502 AC: 76430AN: 152108Hom.: 21570 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.505 AC XY: 37574AN XY: 74338 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 68% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 65. Only high quality variants are reported. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at