rs75858066

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_019098.5(CNGB3):c.354G>T(p.Pro118Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00177 in 1,613,354 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 40 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P118P) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0096 ( 23 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00096 ( 17 hom. )

Consequence

CNGB3
NM_019098.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.416

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CNGB3 (HGNC:2153): (cyclic nucleotide gated channel subunit beta 3) This gene encodes the beta subunit of a cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel. The encoded beta subunit appears to play a role in modulation of channel function in cone photoreceptors. This heterotetrameric channel is necessary for sensory transduction, and mutations in this gene have been associated with achromatopsia 3, progressive cone dystrophy, and juvenile macular degeneration, also known as Stargardt Disease. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2010]

CNGB3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

achromatopsia 3
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, PanelApp Australia
CNGB3-related retinopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
cone dystrophy
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
achromatopsia
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
severe early-childhood-onset retinal dystrophy
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

CNGB3 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).

BP6

Variant 8-86671083-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-86671083-C-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 261088.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.416 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00958 (1454/151764) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0331 (1368/41366). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0316. There are 23 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 700 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 23 AR,AD,Unknown gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CNGB3	NM_019098.5 link	c.354G>T	p.Pro118Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 18	ENST00000320005.6	NP_061971.3	Q9NQW8-1
CNGB3	XM_011517138.3 link	c.-61G>T		5_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 2 of 16		XP_011515440.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CNGB3	ENST00000320005.6 link	c.354G>T	p.Pro118Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 18	1	NM_019098.5	ENSP00000316605.5	Q9NQW8-1
CNGB3	ENST00000680314.1 link	n.115G>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 3
CNGB3	ENST00000681746.1 link	n.354G>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 4 of 19			ENSP00000505959.1	A0A5J6DSN8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00959

AC:

1455

AN:

151646

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0332

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00408

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000162

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00623

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00239

AC:

600

AN:

251238

AF XY:

0.00180

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0337

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00113

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000704

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000652

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000960

AC:

1403

AN:

1461590

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000821

AC XY:

597

AN XY:

727120

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0357

AC:

1194

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00127

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000104

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53236

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000350

AC:

AN:

5720

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000288

AC:

AN:

1111972

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00181

AC:

109

AN:

60380

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.450

Heterozygous variant carriers

171

257

342

428

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

126

168

210

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00958

AC:

1454

AN:

151764

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00944

AC XY:

700

AN XY:

74114

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0331

AC:

1368

AN:

41366

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00407

AC:

AN:

15234

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5144

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4796

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10498

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000162

AC:

AN:

67942

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00616

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.495

Heterozygous variant carriers

132

198

264

330

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00576

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0107

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Jan 26, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified

Benign:1

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Achromatopsia

Benign:1

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Severe early-childhood-onset retinal dystrophy

Benign:1

Apr 28, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Achromatopsia 3

Benign:1

Apr 28, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.65

CADD

Benign

0.72

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.47

PhyloP100

-0.42

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.10

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over