rs758675398
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_002485.5(NBN):āc.2061A>Gā(p.Lys687=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000252 in 1,586,904 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.0000021 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
NBN
NM_002485.5 synonymous
NM_002485.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.18
Genes affected
NBN (HGNC:7652): (nibrin) Mutations in this gene are associated with Nijmegen breakage syndrome, an autosomal recessive chromosomal instability syndrome characterized by microcephaly, growth retardation, immunodeficiency, and cancer predisposition. The encoded protein is a member of the MRE11/RAD50 double-strand break repair complex which consists of 5 proteins. This gene product is thought to be involved in DNA double-strand break repair and DNA damage-induced checkpoint activation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
PM2
?
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
?
Variant 8-89946149-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-89946149-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 483944.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.18 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBN | NM_002485.5 | c.2061A>G | p.Lys687= | synonymous_variant | 13/16 | ENST00000265433.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBN | ENST00000265433.8 | c.2061A>G | p.Lys687= | synonymous_variant | 13/16 | 1 | NM_002485.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152124Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
152124
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000160 AC: 4AN: 250428Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000222 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135420
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
250428
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135420
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000209 AC: 3AN: 1434780Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00000280 AC XY: 2AN XY: 715452
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
1434780
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
715452
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152124Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74316
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
152124
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
74316
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 21, 2024 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 01, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at