Menu
GeneBe

rs75874199

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_002691.4(POLD1):c.2628C>T(p.Ile876=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000929 in 1,613,366 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 12 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00087 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

POLD1
NM_002691.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.72
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLD1 (HGNC:9175): (DNA polymerase delta 1, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the 125-kDa catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta. DNA polymerase delta possesses both polymerase and 3' to 5' exonuclease activity and plays a critical role in DNA replication and repair. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed for this gene, and a pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).
BP6
Variant 19-50415501-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50415501-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 220703.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-50415501-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.72 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00146 (222/152350) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0374 (194/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0331. There are 12 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 118 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 221 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
POLD1NM_002691.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2628C>T p.Ile876= synonymous_variant 21/27 ENST00000440232.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
POLD1ENST00000440232.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.2628C>T p.Ile876= synonymous_variant 21/271 NM_002691.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00145
AC:
221
AN:
152232
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000589
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0374
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00259
AC:
646
AN:
249600
Hom.:
12
AF XY:
0.00255
AC XY:
345
AN XY:
135524
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000125
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000870
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0325
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000444
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000874
AC:
1277
AN:
1461016
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000929
AC XY:
675
AN XY:
726826
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000157
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0234
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000360
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00296
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00146
AC:
222
AN:
152350
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00158
AC XY:
118
AN XY:
74488
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000168
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000588
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0374
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.000380
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00158
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0130
AC:
46
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMar 20, 2017- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The POLD1 p.Ile876= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs75874199) as "With Benign allele ", and in ClinVar database (classified as benign by Invitae, GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, and three clinical laboratories; as likely benign by one clinical laboratory). The variant was identified in control databases in 662 of 275698 chromosomes (12 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 4 of 23876 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Other in 8 of 6434 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Latino in 3 of 34348 chromosomes (freq: 0.00009), European in 6 of 125698 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), East Asian in 608 of 18808 chromosomes (freq: 0.03), and South Asian in 33 of 30756 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, and Finnish, populations. The p.Ile876= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJul 22, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalAug 15, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 18, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4May 12, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 21, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsSep 29, 2017- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 28, 2017Variant summary: The POLD1 c.2628C>T (p.Ile876Ile) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide causing a synonymous change and 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant alters binding of SRp55 and SF2/ASF. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 271/116036 control chromosomes (3 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0023355, which is approximately 164 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic POLD1 variant (0.0000142), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. It is more common in East Asian subpopulation with an allele frequency of 0.0293 (248/8464 chromosomes). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJun 22, 2022- -
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
Cadd
Benign
1.8
Dann
Benign
0.91
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs75874199; hg19: chr19-50918758; COSMIC: COSV54532252; COSMIC: COSV54532252; API