rs75874199
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_002691.4(POLD1):c.2628C>T(p.Ile876=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000929 in 1,613,366 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 25 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 12 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00087 ( 13 hom. )
Consequence
POLD1
NM_002691.4 synonymous
NM_002691.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.72
Genes affected
POLD1 (HGNC:9175): (DNA polymerase delta 1, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the 125-kDa catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta. DNA polymerase delta possesses both polymerase and 3' to 5' exonuclease activity and plays a critical role in DNA replication and repair. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed for this gene, and a pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).
BP6
Variant 19-50415501-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50415501-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 220703.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-50415501-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.72 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00146 (222/152350) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0374 (194/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0331. There are 12 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 118 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 222 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLD1 | NM_002691.4 | c.2628C>T | p.Ile876= | synonymous_variant | 21/27 | ENST00000440232.7 | NP_002682.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLD1 | ENST00000440232.7 | c.2628C>T | p.Ile876= | synonymous_variant | 21/27 | 1 | NM_002691.4 | ENSP00000406046 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00145 AC: 221AN: 152232Hom.: 12 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
221
AN:
152232
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00259 AC: 646AN: 249600Hom.: 12 AF XY: 0.00255 AC XY: 345AN XY: 135524
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
646
AN:
249600
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
345
AN XY:
135524
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000874 AC: 1277AN: 1461016Hom.: 13 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000929 AC XY: 675AN XY: 726826
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1277
AN:
1461016
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
675
AN XY:
726826
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00146 AC: 222AN: 152350Hom.: 12 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00158 AC XY: 118AN XY: 74488
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
222
AN:
152350
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
118
AN XY:
74488
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
46
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jul 22, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The POLD1 p.Ile876= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs75874199) as "With Benign allele ", and in ClinVar database (classified as benign by Invitae, GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, and three clinical laboratories; as likely benign by one clinical laboratory). The variant was identified in control databases in 662 of 275698 chromosomes (12 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 4 of 23876 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Other in 8 of 6434 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Latino in 3 of 34348 chromosomes (freq: 0.00009), European in 6 of 125698 chromosomes (freq: 0.00005), East Asian in 608 of 18808 chromosomes (freq: 0.03), and South Asian in 33 of 30756 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, and Finnish, populations. The p.Ile876= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 20, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 18, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 28, 2017 | Variant summary: The POLD1 c.2628C>T (p.Ile876Ile) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide causing a synonymous change and 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. ESE finder predicts that this variant alters binding of SRp55 and SF2/ASF. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 271/116036 control chromosomes (3 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0023355, which is approximately 164 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic POLD1 variant (0.0000142), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. It is more common in East Asian subpopulation with an allele frequency of 0.0293 (248/8464 chromosomes). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jun 22, 2022 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Sep 29, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 21, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 12, 2021 | - - |
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at