rs75877625

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the c.2238T>C (p.Asn746=) variant in the SOS1 gene is 0.232% (33/10404) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA178021/MONDO:0021060/004

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00081 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000081 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

SOS1
NM_005633.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.47
Variant links:
Genes affected
SOS1 (HGNC:11187): (SOS Ras/Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor 1) This gene encodes a protein that is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for RAS proteins, membrane proteins that bind guanine nucleotides and participate in signal transduction pathways. GTP binding activates and GTP hydrolysis inactivates RAS proteins. The product of this gene may regulate RAS proteins by facilitating the exchange of GTP for GDP. Mutations in this gene are associated with gingival fibromatosis 1 and Noonan syndrome type 4. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.

BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SOS1NM_005633.4 linkc.2238T>C p.Asn746Asn synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 23 ENST00000402219.8 NP_005624.2 Q07889-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SOS1ENST00000402219.8 linkc.2238T>C p.Asn746Asn synonymous_variant Exon 14 of 23 1 NM_005633.4 ENSP00000384675.2 Q07889-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000809
AC:
123
AN:
152034
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00125
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000235
AC:
59
AN:
251048
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000155
AC XY:
21
AN XY:
135682
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00308
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000653
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000814
AC:
119
AN:
1461306
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0000715
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
726982
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00281
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000360
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000149
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000815
AC:
124
AN:
152152
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000780
AC XY:
58
AN XY:
74366
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00250
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00125
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000409
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00106

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Aug 20, 2012
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Mar 19, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Asn746Asn in Exon 14 of SOS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located withi n the splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 0.4% (16/3738) of Afr ican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs75877625). -

Apr 10, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

RASopathy Benign:2
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 18, 2017
ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel
Significance: Benign
Review Status: reviewed by expert panel
Collection Method: curation

The filtering allele frequency of the c.2238T>C (p.Asn746=) variant in the SOS1 gene is 0.232% (33/10404) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) -

Noonan syndrome 4;C4551558:Fibromatosis, gingival, 1 Benign:1
Jul 28, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
Sep 01, 2022
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

SOS1: BS1, BS2 -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Mar 26, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.49
CADD
Benign
8.9
DANN
Benign
0.71
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs75877625; hg19: chr2-39239419; API