rs75933366
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_017890.5(VPS13B):c.4247G>A(p.Arg1416Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00199 in 1,613,910 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 48 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R1416R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017890.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPS13B | NM_017890.5 | c.4247G>A | p.Arg1416Gln | missense_variant | 28/62 | ENST00000358544.7 | |
VPS13B | NM_152564.5 | c.4224+656G>A | intron_variant | ENST00000357162.7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VPS13B | ENST00000358544.7 | c.4247G>A | p.Arg1416Gln | missense_variant | 28/62 | 1 | NM_017890.5 | ||
VPS13B | ENST00000357162.7 | c.4224+656G>A | intron_variant | 1 | NM_152564.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0107 AC: 1633AN: 151988Hom.: 30 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00283 AC: 711AN: 251344Hom.: 10 AF XY: 0.00211 AC XY: 286AN XY: 135830
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00107 AC: 1570AN: 1461804Hom.: 18 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000956 AC XY: 695AN XY: 727208
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0108 AC: 1637AN: 152106Hom.: 30 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0106 AC XY: 789AN XY: 74368
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cohen syndrome Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Apr 14, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 21, 2019 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 19, 2017 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at