rs759392029

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP3BS2

The NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.910G>T(p.Gly304Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000062 in 1,613,620 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G304D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000062 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RAD51D
NM_002878.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.96

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RAD51D (HGNC:9823): (RAD51 paralog D) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the RAD51 protein family. RAD51 family members are highly similar to bacterial RecA and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51, which are known to be involved in the homologous recombination and repair of DNA. This protein forms a complex with several other members of the RAD51 family, including RAD51L1, RAD51L2, and XRCC2. The protein complex formed with this protein has been shown to catalyze homologous pairing between single- and double-stranded DNA, and is thought to play a role in the early stage of recombinational repair of DNA. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Read-through transcription also exists between this gene and the downstream ring finger and FYVE-like domain containing 1 (RFFL) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

RAD51D Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
hereditary breast carcinoma
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

RAD51D links:

ENSG00000267618 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000267618 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

PP3

MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.751

BS2

High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 9 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RAD51D	NM_002878.4 link	c.910G>T	p.Gly304Cys	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 10	ENST00000345365.11	NP_002869.3	O75771-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RAD51D	ENST00000345365.11 link	c.910G>T	p.Gly304Cys	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 10	1	NM_002878.4	ENSP00000338790.6		O75771-1
ENSG00000267618	ENST00000593039.5 link	c.426+171G>T		intron_variant	Intron 5 of 6	2		ENSP00000466834.1		K7EN88

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152200

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00000795

AC:

AN:

251476

AF XY:

0.00000736

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000616

AC:

AN:

1461420

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000688

AC XY:

AN XY:

727058

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86246

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000810

AC:

AN:

1111586

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60378

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.442

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152200

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74350

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41458

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15276

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5200

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68036

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.575

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.0000282

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000151

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:2

Jun 29, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.G304C variant (also known as c.910G>T), located in coding exon 10 of the RAD51D gene, results from a G to T substitution at nucleotide position 910. The glycine at codon 304 is replaced by cysteine, an amino acid with highly dissimilar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Aug 12, 2024

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This missense variant replaces glycine with cysteine at codon 304 of the RAD51D protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has been identified in 2/251476 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4

Uncertain:2

Feb 09, 2024

Baylor Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 11, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces glycine, which is neutral and non-polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 304 of the RAD51D protein (p.Gly304Cys). This variant is present in population databases (rs759392029, gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RAD51D-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 232482). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt RAD51D protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. Studies have shown that this missense change is associated with inconclusive levels of altered splicing (internal data). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

not specified

Uncertain:1

May 30, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: RAD51D c.910G>T (p.Gly304Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the DNA recombination and repair protein Rad51-like, C-terminal and AAA+ ATPase domain of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8e-06 in 251476 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.910G>T in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Jun 05, 2023

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; In silico analysis is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown.; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21111057, 14704354, 19327148) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.26

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.11

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.080

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.93

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.57

D;D;.;.;.

Eigen

Uncertain

0.56

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.50

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.94

LIST_S2

Benign

0.81

.;T;T;T;T

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.12

MetaRNN

Pathogenic

0.75

D;D;D;D;D

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.12

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.9

L;L;.;.;.

PhyloP100

3.0

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.3

D;.;.;.;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.44

Sift

Uncertain

0.024

D;.;.;.;.

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.016

D;D;D;D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;D;D;.;.

Vest4

0.69

MutPred

0.52

Loss of disorder (P = 0.0443);Loss of disorder (P = 0.0443);.;.;.;

MVP

0.93

MPC

0.46

ClinPred

0.91

GERP RS

5.2

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.17

gMVP

0.60

Mutation Taster

=84/16

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.29

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

DS_AL_spliceai

0.29

Position offset: 6

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

rs759392029

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over