rs759522148
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_000245.4(MET):c.2755G>A(p.Val919Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000502 in 1,613,700 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000245.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET | NM_000245.4 | c.2755G>A | p.Val919Ile | missense_variant | Exon 13 of 21 | ENST00000397752.8 | NP_000236.2 | |
MET | NM_001127500.3 | c.2809G>A | p.Val937Ile | missense_variant | Exon 13 of 21 | NP_001120972.1 | ||
MET | NM_001324402.2 | c.1465G>A | p.Val489Ile | missense_variant | Exon 12 of 20 | NP_001311331.1 | ||
MET | XM_011516223.2 | c.2812G>A | p.Val938Ile | missense_variant | Exon 14 of 22 | XP_011514525.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152110Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000562 AC: 14AN: 249326Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000517 AC XY: 7AN XY: 135270
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000527 AC: 77AN: 1461472Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000646 AC XY: 47AN XY: 727032
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74434
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
- -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 97 Uncertain:1
- -
Papillary renal cell carcinoma type 1 Uncertain:1
The MET c.2809G>A (p.Val937Ile)? missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.039% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with hereditary papillary renal cell carcinoma. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance.? -
not provided Uncertain:1
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Renal cell carcinoma Benign:1
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at