rs760016065
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_133259.4(LRPPRC):c.3430C>T(p.Arg1144Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000366 in 1,613,728 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_133259.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRPPRC | NM_133259.4 | c.3430C>T | p.Arg1144Cys | missense_variant | Exon 32 of 38 | ENST00000260665.12 | NP_573566.2 | |
LRPPRC | XM_006711915.3 | c.3352C>T | p.Arg1118Cys | missense_variant | Exon 32 of 38 | XP_006711978.1 | ||
LRPPRC | XM_047442809.1 | c.3304C>T | p.Arg1102Cys | missense_variant | Exon 32 of 38 | XP_047298765.1 | ||
LRPPRC | XR_007068563.1 | n.3472C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 32 of 38 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000920 AC: 14AN: 152172Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000143 AC: 36AN: 251402Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000118 AC XY: 16AN XY: 135874
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000308 AC: 45AN: 1461556Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000261 AC XY: 19AN XY: 727090
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000920 AC: 14AN: 152172Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000108 AC XY: 8AN XY: 74340
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital lactic acidosis, Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean type Uncertain:3
- -
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: LRPPRC c.3430C>T (p.Arg1144Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00014 in 251402 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than expected for a pathogenic variant in LRPPRC causing Leigh Syndrome, French-Canadian Type (0.00014 vs 0.0005), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.3430C>T has been reported in the literature as a non-informative genotype (phase/co-segregation/zygosity/genotype not clearly specified) in at-least two reports of an individual affected with mild Leigh Syndrome, outside of Quebec (example, Xinyang Han_2017) and in an individual with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) who underwent a multigene panel analysis (example, Chung_2021). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Leigh Syndrome, French-Canadian Type. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at