dbSNP rs760538931: LYST:p.Pro2595Leu (chr1-235746524-G-A) – ACMG Classification: Uncertain_significance (0 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate

The NM_000081.4(LYST):c.7784C>T(p.Pro2595Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000686 in 1,458,476 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 6.9e-7 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

LYST
NM_000081.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.59

Variant links:

Genes affected

LYST (HGNC:1968): (lysosomal trafficking regulator) This gene encodes a protein that regulates intracellular protein trafficking in endosomes, and may be involved in pigmentation. Mutations in this gene are associated with Chediak-Higashi syndrome, a lysosomal storage disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, though the full-length nature of some of these variants has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2013]

LYST links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.2192871).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LYST	NM_000081.4 link	c.7784C>T	p.Pro2595Leu	missense_variant	Exon 29 of 53	ENST00000389793.7	NP_000072.2	Q99698-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
LYST	ENST00000389793.7 link	c.7784C>T	p.Pro2595Leu	missense_variant	Exon 29 of 53	5	NM_000081.4	ENSP00000374443.2		Q99698-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

Cov.:

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00000402

AC:

AN:

248944

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00000743

AC XY:

AN XY:

134618

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000999

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

6.86e-7

AC:

AN:

1458476

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000138

AC XY:

AN XY:

725628

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000383

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

Cov.:

Alfa

AF:

0.000111

Hom.:

ExAC

AF:

0.00000824

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Chédiak-Higashi syndrome

Uncertain:1

Feb 01, 2018

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with LYST-related disease. This variant is present in population databases (rs760538931, ExAC 0.002%). This sequence change replaces proline with leucine at codon 2595 of the LYST protein (p.Pro2595Leu). The proline residue is moderately conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between proline and leucine. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.089

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.085

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.36

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.17

Eigen

Benign

0.097

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.27

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.95

M_CAP

Benign

0.035

MetaRNN

Benign

0.22

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.87

MutationAssessor

Benign

2.0

PrimateAI

Benign

0.33

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.6

REVEL

Benign

0.063

Sift

Benign

0.064

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.014

Polyphen

0.012

Vest4

0.44

MutPred

0.25

Loss of disorder (P = 0.0523);

MVP

0.37

ClinPred

0.89

GERP RS

5.5

Varity_R

0.18

gMVP

0.26

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over